[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Afzalunnisa Begum Vs The State of A.P. on 10 December, 2009
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Archana Hemant Naik Vs Urmilaben I. Naik And Anr on 25 August, 2009
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Eveneet Singh Vs Prashant Chaudhri & Ors on 20 December, 2010
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Preeti Satija Vs Raj Kumari on 15 January, 2014
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
J.Anitha Valarmathy Vs K.John Hilton Maharaja on 17 July, 2014
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
R.Nivendran vs Nivashini Mohan @ M.Nivashini on 17 February, 2010
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1544244/
Sonia Manchanda Vs Ashok Manchanda on 7 November 2016
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/155509051/
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/150911054/
Being Farmer
1. Device to detect hailstorm or rains and deflate protective shade to crops.
Multiple small umbrellas deployed automatically
Shatrughna Prasad Sinha Vs Rajbhau Surajmal Rathi and Ors on 10 September 1996
This is case of Defamation that the Supreme Court has partly quashed as the comments which were alleged to be defamatory were found by SC as not defamatory.
It would thus be seen that when a private complaint is made to the Magistrate, before the Magistrate takes cognizance of the offence on the complaint so as to take the other steps, the complaint shall contain all the necessary facts constituting the offence for which the complaint was laid, so that the Magistrate can proceed further in taking further steps after cognizance of the offence is taken by issuing the process etc.
And then,
But we do not find any allegation made in the complaint. Accordingly, we hold that the complaint filed in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class in Court No.4 at Pune does not contain any of the allegations so as to constitute the offence of defamation defined in Section 499 and punishable under Section 500. Consequently, the Magistrate was not justified in issuing the process against the appellant. The complaint is accordingly quashed.
Citations:
Other Source links:
The Index for Defamation Judgments is here.
