web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Author: ShadesOfKnife

Inderjeet Kaur Kalsi Vs NCT of Delhi and Anr on 27 Nov 2013

Posted on July 9, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

A single judge of Delhi High Court held as follows,

From Paras 21.1 and 21.2,

21. Findings
21.1 At the outset, this Court is of the view that having availed the remedy of revision before the Sessions Court under Section 397 Cr.P.C., the petitioner cannot be allowed to re-agitate the same point before this Court in a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as it would amount to a second revision which is specifically barred by Section 397(3) Cr.P.C. This petition amounts to a second revision petition in the garb of Section 482 Cr.P.C.
21.2 Although the power of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is very wide, it has to be used sparingly and cautiously to prevent the abuse of process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. The petitioner has also not been able to make out any case of abuse of process of Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. This Court is, therefore, not inclined to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Inderjeet Kaur Kalsi Vs NCT of Delhi and Anr on 27 Nov 2013
Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to CrPC 311 - Power to summon material witness or examine person present CrPC 397(3) - Second Revision is Not Permissible CrPC 482 - Saving of inherent powers of High Court Inderjeet Kaur Kalsi Vs NCT of Delhi and Anr Reportable Judgement or Order | Leave a comment

State (CBI) Vs Hemendhra Reddy and Anr on 28 Apr 2023

Posted on July 3, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

A division bench of Apex Court held as follows,

From Paras 76 and 77,

76. Thus, a conspectus of the aforesaid decisions of this Court rendered in cases where final reports (closure reports) had already been submitted and
accepted makes the position of law very clear that even after the final report is laid before the Magistrate and is accepted, it is permissible for the investigating agency to carry out further investigation in the case. In other words, there is no bar against conducting further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC after the final report submitted under Section 173(2) of the CrPC has been accepted. It is also evident, that prior to carrying out a further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC, it is not necessary for the Magistrate to review or recall the order accepting the final report.
77. We may summarise our final conclusion as under:
(i) Even after the final report is laid before the Magistrate and is accepted, it is permissible for the investigating agency to carry out further investigation in the case. In other words, there is no bar against conducting further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC after the final report submitted under Section 173(2) of the CrPC has been accepted.
(ii) Prior to carrying out further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC it is not necessary that the order accepting the final report should be reviewed, recalled or quashed.
(iv) Further investigation is merely a continuation of the earlier investigation, hence it cannot be said that the accused are being subjected to investigation twice over. Moreover, investigation cannot be put at par with prosecution and punishment so as to fall within the ambit of Clause (2) of Article 20 of the Constitution. The principle of double jeopardy would, therefore, not be applicable to further investigation.
(v) There is nothing in the CrPC to suggest that the court is obliged to hear the accused while considering an application for further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC.

State (CBI) Vs Hemendhra Reddy and Anr on 28 Apr 2023
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision CrPC 173(8) - Magistrate can Order Further Investigation State (CBI) Vs Hemendhra Reddy and Anr | Leave a comment

CB Prakash and Anr Vs State of Karnataka and Anr on 04 Jun 2024

Posted on July 1, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

A single judge of Karnataka High Court held as follows, while quashing false FIR against In-Laws,

From Para 10,

10. There are scores and scores of cases where allegations are made that have pointed overt acts by every member of the family which are sustained and further trial is permitted. There are even scores and scores of cases where every member of the family without rhyme or reason is dragged into the web of crime by frivolous complaints registered by the complainant/wife while the entire grievance is against the husband and every imaginary member of the family is dragged in. It is these cases which are to be nipped in the bud. Bud, I mean, at the stage of registration of the crime, failing which, it would run foul of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of KAHKASHAN KAUSAR v. STATE OF BIHAR1

CB Prakash and Anr Vs State of Karnataka and Anr on 04 Jun 2024

Index of Quash judgments is here.

Posted in High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations CB Prakash and Anr Vs State of Karnataka and Anr Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives IPC 498a - Not Made Out Against Parents or Relatives Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam Vs State of Bihar Legal Terrorism | Leave a comment

D. Narsimha @Narsimlu Vs D.Anita @Vaishnavi on 21 Jun 2024

Posted on June 30, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

A division bench of the Telangana High Court granted divorce to husband, by holding that,

From Para 16,

16. The obliteration of marital ties is entirely for the persons in the marriage and upon them to assess and resolve in the best way they think fit. The Court has a limited role in the whole affair and should not act as an executioner (in the sense of a hangman) or a counsellor to compel the parties to continue living as wife and husband, particularly where the meeting of minds between them has irrevocably ended. It is certainly not the Court’s work to ferret out faultlines in the evidence in negation of cruelty in an altruistic zeal for preserving the marriage. This kind of exercise is unwarranted and pointless.

From Paras 17 and 18,

17. It is relevant to state that the Trial Court also held that the brief “reunion” of the parties in May, 2015 precluded the appellant from re-agitating events prior to the respondent coming to live with the appellant as it indicated forgiveness on the part of the appellant. We are unable to agree with the reasoning and the presumption.
18. Condonation and forgiveness means restoration of the offending spouse to the same position as he/she was before the offence was committed. The evidence must also point to this direction: Dr.N.G. Dastane v. Mrs. S. Dastane13. Forgiveness would be a misnomer in a case where the wife stays with the husband for 2 months and then leaves the matrimonial home and lodges an F.I.R. against the husband and his family members for offences punishable under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. and the Dowry Prohibition Act: Malathi Ravi, M.D v. B.V. Ravi, M.D.14. The Supreme Court in that case held that the husband had been treated with mental cruelty and affirmed the decree of divorce granted by the High Court.

D. Narsimha @Narsimlu Vs D.Anita @Vaishnavi on 21 Jun 2024

Trial Court Order dismissing the Divorce petition:

D. Narsimha @Narsimlu Vs D.Anita @Vaishnavi on 02 Nov 2021
Posted in High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to D. Narsimha @Narsimlu Vs D.Anita @Vaishnavi Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband | Leave a comment

Vishal Noble Singh Vs State of Uttar Pradesh on 24 Jan 2024

Posted on June 29, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

A division bench of Apex Court held as follows

From Para 14,

14. The contents of the FIR as well as the chargesheet would have to be read in light of the ingredients mentioned in the aforesaid Sections and in light of the facts and circumstances of these cases. The FIR as well as the charge-sheet have invoked Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 120B of the IPC. The aforesaid Sections are reproduced above. We fail to understand as to how the allegations against the appellants herein could be brought within the scope and ambit of the aforesaid sections.

From Para 17,

17. On a reading of the FIR as well as the charge-sheet, we do not find that the offences aforestated is made out at all. We do not find any criminal breach of trust nor any cheating by impersonation. There is also no cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, nor has any documents referred to any forgery or security or any forgery for the purpose of cheating. There is no reference to any document which has been forged so as to be used as a genuine document and much less is as there any criminal conspiracy which can be imputed to the appellants herein in the absence of any offence being made out vis-a-vis the aforesaid Sections.

From Para 19,

19. On a careful consideration of the aforementioned judicial dicta, we find that none of the offences alleged against the Accused-Appellants herein is made out. In fact, we find that the allegations of criminal intent and other allegations against the Accused-Appellants herein have been made with a malafide intent and therefore, the judgment of this Court in the case of Bhajan Lal and particularly sub-paragraphs 1, 3, 5 and 7 of paragraph 102, extracted above, squarely apply to the facts of these cases. It is neither expedient nor in the interest of justice to permit the present prosecution to continue.

From Paras 21-23,

21. We find that in recent years the machinery of criminal justice is being misused by certain persons for their vested interests and for achieving their oblique motives and agenda. Courts have therefore to be vigilant against such tendencies and ensure that acts of omission and commission having an adverse impact on the fabric of our society must be nipped in the bud.
22. We say so for the reason that while the second respondent-complainant has made grave allegations against the appellants herein and on whose behalf a charge-sheet has also been filed against such allegations has failed to appear before this Court to justify the same. Such acts would not only cause deep fissures and mistrust between people and also unnecessarily burden the law courts and the criminal justice system.
23. We are constrained to make the aforesaid observations particularly having regard to the fact that the second Respondent complainant having made the allegations against the appellants and others has failed to appear before this Court to justify the same. The non-appearance of the second respondent before this Court is indicative of his prejudicial attitude and temperament and his inability to justify any of the allegations against the appellants herein and therefore his absence in this proceeding.

Vishal Noble Singh Vs State of Uttar Pradesh on 24 Jan 2024
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision CrPC 256 - Non Appearance Or Death Of Complainant Non-Reportable Judgement or Order Vishal Noble Singh Vs State of Uttar Pradesh | Leave a comment

BNSS Sec 529 – Duty of High Court to exercise continuous superintendence over Courts

Posted on June 27, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

529. Duty of High Court to exercise continuous superintendence over Courts.
Every High Court shall so exercise its superintendence over the Courts of Session and Courts of Judicial Magistrates subordinate to it as to ensure that there is an expeditious and proper disposal of cases by the Judges and Magistrates.


Note: Earlier Section 483 of Cr.P.C. allowed a High Court to have Duty of High Court to exercise continuous superintendence over only Judicial Magistrates but now in BNSS, that duty covers Courts of Sessions too…


Entire Sanhita available here.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged BNSS Sec 529 – Duty of High Court to exercise continuous superintendence over Courts CrPC 483 - Duty of High Court to exercise continuous superintendence over Courts of Judicial Magistrates Enhancement in BNSS 2023 over CrPC 1973 | Leave a comment

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (erstwhile CrPC 1973)

Posted on June 27, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

The Gazette of the BNSS, 2023 is here. The following is a list of BNSS sections.


Some helpful tips against Police atrocities or Judicial Overactions are here and here. Just in case…


  1. BNSS Sec 70 – Proof of service in such cases and when serving officer not present
  2. BNSS Sec 72 – Form of warrant of arrest and duration
  3. BNSS Sec 144 – Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents
  4. BNSS Sec 145 – Procedure
  5. BNSS Sec 146 – Alteration in allowance
  6. BNSS Sec 147 – Enforcement of order of maintenance
  7. BNSS Sec 228 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused
  8. BNSS Sec 250 – Discharge
  9. BNSS Sec 251 – Framing of charge
  10. BNSS Sec 254 – Evidence for prosecution
  11. BNSS Sec 258 – Judgment of acquittal or conviction
  12. BNSS Sec 355 – Provision for inquiries and trial being held in absence of accused in certain cases
  13. BNSS 379 – Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215
  14. BNSS Sec 393 – Language and contents of judgment
  15. BNSS Sec 438 – Calling for records to exercise powers of revision
  16. BNSS Sec 528 – Saving of inherent powers of High Court
  17. BNSS Sec 529 – Duty of High Court to exercise continuous superintendence over Courts
  18. BNSS Sec 530 – Trial and proceedings to be held in electronic mode

 


Some “Sections of Interest” to me because they have time limits prescribed in them… Now the difficult task ahead of me is to get them invoked at ALL appropriate stages of ALL cases.

  1. BNSS 173(1)(ii) : Sign the complaint within 3 days from date of giving complaint electronically
  2. BNSS 173(3)(i) : Conduct preliminary enquiry to ascertain whether there exists a prima facie case for proceeding in the matter, within a period of fourteen days;
  3. BNSS 187(3)(i) : no Magistrate shall authorise the detention of the accused person for a total period exceeding ninety days, where the investigation relates to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of ten years or more;
  4. BNSS 187(3)(ii) : no Magistrate shall authorise the detention of the accused person for a total period exceeding sixty days, where the investigation relates to other offence;
  5. BNSS 193(3)(i) : the police officer shall, within a period of ninety days, inform the progress of the investigation by any means including through electronic communication to the informant or the victim;
  6. BNSS 193(9)Proviso : Provided that further investigation during the trial may be conducted with the permission of the Court trying the case and the same shall be completed within a period of ninety days which may be extended with the permission of the Court.
  7. BNSS 218(1)(b) 2nd Proviso : Provided further that such Government shall take a decision within a period of one hundred and twenty days from the date of the receipt of the request for sanction and in case it fails to do so, the sanction shall be deemed to have been accorded by such Government
  8. BNSS 230 : In any case where the proceeding has been instituted on a police report, the Magistrate shall without delay, and in no case beyond fourteen days from the date of production or appearance of the accused, furnish to the accused and the victim (if represented by an advocate) free of cost of Challan
  9. BNSS 232 : Provided that the proceedings under this section shall be completed within a period of ninety days from the date of taking cognizance, and such period may be extended by the Magistrate for a period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days for the reasons to be recorded in writing:
  10. BNSS 250(1) : The accused may prefer an application for discharge within a period of sixty days from the date of commitment of the case under section 232.
  11. BNSS 251(1)(b) : is exclusively triable by the Court, he shall frame in writing a charge against the accused within a period of sixty days from the date of first hearing on charge.
  12. BNSS 258(1) : After hearing arguments and points of law (if any), the Judge shall give a judgment in the case, as soon as possible, within a period of thirty days from the date of completion of arguments, which may be extended to a period of forty-five days for reasons to be recorded in writing.
  13. BNSS 262(1) : The accused may prefer an application for discharge within a period of sixty days from the date of supply of copies of documents under section 230.
  14. BNSS 263(1) : he shall frame in writing a charge against the accused within a period of sixty days from the date of first hearing on charge.
  15. BNSS 272 : When the proceedings have been instituted upon complaint, and on any day fixed for the hearing of the case, the complainant is absent, the Magistrate may after giving thirty days’ time to the complainant to be present, in his discretion, notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, at any time before the charge has been framed, discharge the accused.
  16. BNSS 279(1) : If the summons has been issued on complaint, and on the day appointed for the appearance of the accused, or any day subsequent thereto to which the hearing may be adjourned, the complainant does not appear, the Magistrate shall, after giving thirty days’ time to the complainant to be present, notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, acquit the accused, unless for some reason he thinks it proper to adjourn the hearing of the case to some other day:
  17. BNSS 330(1) : Where any document is filed before any Court by the prosecution or the accused, the particulars of every such document shall be included in a list and the prosecution or the accused or the advocate for the prosecution or the accused, if any, shall be called upon to admit or deny the genuineness of each such document soon after supply of such documents and in no case later than thirty days after such supply:
  18. BNSS 356(1) : Notwithstanding anything contained in this Sanhita or in any other law for the time being in force, when a person declared as a proclaimed offender, whether or not charged jointly, has absconded to evade trial and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, it shall be deemed to operate as a waiver of the right of such person to be present and tried in person,
    • Provided that the Court shall not commence the trial unless a period of ninety days has lapsed from the date of framing of the charge.
  19. BNSS 356(2) : The Court shall ensure that the following procedure has been complied with before proceeding under sub-section (1), namely: —
    (i) issuance of two consecutive warrants of arrest within the interval of at least thirty days;
    (ii) publish in a national or local daily newspaper circulating in the place of his last known address of residence, requiring the proclaimed offender to appear before the Court for trial and informing him that in case he fails to appear within thirty days from the date of such publication, the trial shall commence in his absence;
  20. BNSS 392(1) : The judgment in every trial in any Criminal Court of original jurisdiction shall be pronounced in open Court by the presiding officer immediately after the termination of the trial or at some subsequent time not later than forty-five days of which notice shall be given to the parties or their advocates
  21. BNSS 392(4) : Where the judgment is pronounced in the manner specified in clause (c) of sub-section (1), the whole judgment or a copy thereof shall be immediately made available for the perusal of the parties or their advocates free of cost:
    • Provided that the Court shall, as far as practicable, upload the copy of the judgment on its portal within a period of seven days from the date of judgment.

If tabular-format is needed, the following can help… (not my creation!)

202401290404034810288SpecificTimeLines
Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (erstwhile CrPC) Enhancement in BNSS 2023 over CrPC 1973 | Leave a comment

BNSS Sec 528 – Saving of inherent powers of High Court

Posted on June 27, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

528. Nothing in this Sanhita shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Sanhita, or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.


Entire Sanhita available here.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged BNSS Sec 528 – Saving of inherent powers of High Court CrPC 482 - Saving of inherent powers of High Court | Leave a comment

BNSS Sec 438 – Calling for records to exercise powers of revision

Posted on June 27, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

438. Calling for records to exercise powers of revision
(1) The High Court or any Sessions Judge may call for and examine the record of any proceeding before any inferior Criminal Court situate within its or his local jurisdiction for the purpose of satisfying itself or himself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order, recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of such inferior Court, and may, when calling, for such record, direct that the execution of any sentence or order be suspended, and if the accused is in confinement that he be released on his own bond or bail bond pending the examination of the record.
Explanation.—All Magistrates, whether Executive or Judicial, and whether exercising original or appellate jurisdiction, shall be deemed to be inferior to the Sessions Judge for the purposes of this sub-section and of section 439.
(2) The powers of revision conferred by sub-section (1) shall not be exercised in relation to any interlocutory order passed in any appeal, inquiry, trial or other proceeding.
(3) If an application under this section has been made by any person either to the High Court or to the Sessions Judge, no further application by the same person shall be entertained by the other of them.


Entire Sanhita available here.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged BNSS Sec 438 – Calling for records to exercise powers of revision CrPC 397 - Calling for records to exercise powers of revision | Leave a comment

BNSS Sec 228 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused

Posted on June 27, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

228. Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused.
(1) Whenever a Magistrate issues a summons, he may, if he sees reason so to do, dispense with the personal attendance of the accused and permit him to appear by his advocate.
(2) But the Magistrate inquiring into or trying the case may, in his discretion, at any stage of the proceedings, direct the personal attendance of the accused, and, if necessary, enforce such attendance in the manner hereinbefore provided.


Note: Only ‘pleader’ word is replaced with ‘advocate’ in subsection 2.


Corresponding provision in CrPC is here.


Entire Sanhita available here.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged BNSS Sec 228 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused CrPC 205 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts
  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
dir_ed

ED

Verified account @dir_ed ·
21 Aug

ED, Hydedrabad Zonal Office has conducted search operations at 07 locations in Hyderabad and Kadapa under PMLA, 2002 on 21.08.2026 in connection with Late Sh. Y S Vivekananda Reddy murder case. The search operations resulted in seizure of incriminating documents & digital

Reply on Twitter 2090770026018337278 Retweet on Twitter 2090770026018337278 127 Like on Twitter 2090770026018337278 288 X 2090770026018337278
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
deccanchronicle

Deccan Chronicle

Verified account @deccanchronicle ·
21 Aug

Kadapa: The Enforcement Directorate (#ED) conducted searches at six locations in #Kadapa and Hyderabad on Friday in connection with a money laundering probe linked to the murder of former Andhra Pradesh minister #YSVivekanandaReddy.

Reply on Twitter 2090632327265415528 Retweet on Twitter 2090632327265415528 1 Like on Twitter 2090632327265415528 1 X 2090632327265415528
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
parasharyayana

𝚿 ࿗॥Trasádasyu॥࿘ 𝚿 𑖌𑖼 Caṇḍīcaraṇaparāyaṇa 𓃓

@parasharyayana ·
21 Aug

How is that I'm only discovering this now?? 🤗

Reply on Twitter 2090695220996571592 Retweet on Twitter 2090695220996571592 111 Like on Twitter 2090695220996571592 683 X 2090695220996571592
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
khnh80044

Love Music

Verified account @khnh80044 ·
18 Aug

A senior officer hugs a man after seeing that no one came to meet him.🥺❤️

Reply on Twitter 2089697452345704766 Retweet on Twitter 2089697452345704766 798 Like on Twitter 2089697452345704766 14197 X 2089697452345704766

Recent Posts

  • Antics of Advocates in India August 14, 2026
  • Antics of Police Personnel in India August 14, 2026
  • Application for Closure of Prosecution Evidence – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft August 6, 2026
  • Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P. on 29 May 2026 July 26, 2026
  • Prabhakar Yeshwant Masram and Anr Vs Sou Tula Namdeorao Jaipurkar and Anr on 21 Jul 2026 July 26, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation (5,217 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (3,321 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (2,680 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case – Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (2,235 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (2,230 views)
  • Can You Travel Abroad After an FIR Is Registered? – Legal Position Explained (2,213 views)
  • Life Cycle of a Perjury Case (2,187 views)
  • Application for Certified Copy of FIR – Format, Procedure and Sample Draft (1,920 views)
  • Appeal, Revision and Review Explained (1,868 views)
  • Life Cycle Stages of a Restitution of Conjugal Rights Case (1,797 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (439)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (425)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (387)Landmark Case (384)1-Judge Bench Decision (370)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (298)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (91)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC (70)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (62)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (44)CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents (43)HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court (42)Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground (42)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (760)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (329)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (187)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (167)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (95)Legal Procedure (84)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (71)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (63)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (53)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (53)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (47)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (47)Prakasam DV Cases (46)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (28)

Recent Comments

  • pradeep jain on How to Challenge Ex Parte Orders in Criminal and Matrimonial Proceedings – Legal Remedies
  • Lawyer Sonia on Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC)
  • vinod gupta on Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation
  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases – Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case

Archives of SoK

  • August 2026 (3)
  • July 2026 (19)
  • June 2026 (19)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS feed: Cloudflare Status Cloudflare Status

  • EWR (Newark) on 2026-09-02 September 2, 2026
    Jul 21, 15:30 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in EWR (Newark) datacenter on 2026-09-02 between 05:00 and 09:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for end-users in the affected region. For PNI / CNI customers […]
    Cloudflare

RSS feed: List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 78.153.140.199 | SDW August 22, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 11,937 | First: 2025-11-28 | Last: 2026-08-22
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati and Advocate Suprajaa Rajan
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 312 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel