web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Author: ShadesOfKnife

Goa Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs R.K. Chawla on 4 July, 2011

Posted on June 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Hon’ble Apex Court in this judgment, had rejected the application of a Deputy Manager of a Company to appear and argue on behalf of the petitioner-Company.

A natural person can, of course, appear in person and argue his own case personally but he cannot give a power of attorney to anyone other than a person who is enrolled as an advocate to appear on his behalf. To hold otherwise would be to defeat the provisions of the Advocates Act.

Who can be Party in Person?

Section 32 of the Act, however, vests discretion in the court, authority or person to permit any person who is not enrolled as an advocate to appear before the court and argue a particular case. Section 32 of the Act is not the right of a person (other than an enrolled advocate) to appear and argue before the court but it is the discretion conferred by the Act on the court to permit any one to appear in a particular case even though he is not enrolled as an advocate.

… and more…

We make it clear that as regards artificial persons like a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, or a registered co-operative society, or a trust, neither the Director of the Company nor member of the Managing Committee or office bearer of the registered society or a trustee has a right to appear and argue on behalf of that entity, since that entity is distinct from its shareholders or office bearers or directors. However, it is the discretion of the court under Section 32 of the Act to permit such person to appear on behalf of that entity.

From Para 7,

7. There is a distinction between the right to appear on behalf of someone, which is only given to enrolled lawyers, and the discretion in the court to permit a non-lawyer to appear before it. Under Sections 29 and 33 of the Act only those persons have a right to appear and argue before the court who are enrolled as an advocate while under Section 32 of the Act, a power is vested in the court to permit, in a particular case, a person other than an advocate to appear before it and argue the case. A power-of-attorney holder cannot, unless he is an enrolled lawyer, appear in court on behalf of anyone, unless, permitted by the court under Section 32 of the Act, though of course he may sign sale deeds, agreements, etc. and do other acts on behalf of someone else, unless prohibited by law.

Goa Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs R.K. Chawla on 4 July, 2011

Citations : [2011 ACR SC 2 2269], [2011 JKJ SC 3 56], [2011 JT SC 7 559], [2011 KLT SC 3 498], [2011 RCR CIVIL 4 252], [2011 SCALE 7 413], [2011 SCC 15 449], [2011 SCR 7 846], [2014 SCC CIV 2 617], [2011 MWN CR 3 290], [2011 AIOL 469], [2011 RCR CIVIL SC 4 257], [2011 KLT 3 498], [2011 JT 7 559]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170747848/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609af02e4b0149711415575


 

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision Advocates Act Section 32 Goa Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs R.K. Chawla Landmark Case Private Person or GPA Holder To Act and Plead for Plaintiff Reportable Judgement or Order | Leave a comment

NagarathnaMurthy Vs S Narayanappa on 20 November, 2011

Posted on June 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this judgment of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, the General Power of Attorney Holder was allowed to act on behalf of Plaintiff under Section 32 of Advocates Act. This is done under the discretionary power of Hon’ble Court and on application of Plaintiff. Plaintiff can not claim this to be one of his rights.

NagarathnaMurthy Vs S Narayanappa on 20 November, 2011

 

Posted in High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Advocates Act Section 32 NagarathnaMurthy Vs S Narayanappa Private Person or GPA Holder To Act and Plead for Plaintiff | Leave a comment

Abhyudya Sanstha Vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 May, 2011

Posted on June 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

A batch of SLPs submitted by appellant educational institutions are dismissed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in this judgment, who were held not to have approached the Apex Court with clean hands.

Abhyudya Sanstha vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 May, 2011

 

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Abhyudya Sanstha Vs Union Of India and Ors Perjury - Approached Court with Unclean Hands | Leave a comment

D-Block Pandav Nagar Residents Vs Amit Yadav And Ors on 13 October, 2015

Posted on June 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

A society which has earlier given NOC for Raam Leela in a park later on made a U turn and filed a Contempt of Court proceeding which was duly stuck down by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi

D-Block Pandav Nagar Residents Vs Amit Yadav And Ors on 13 October, 2015

Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged D-Block Pandav Nagar Residents Vs Amit Yadav And Ors Perjury - Approached Court with Unclean Hands Suppression of Material Facts | Leave a comment

MS Manu Sharma And Company Vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 29 September, 2016

Posted on June 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Interesting case of a liquor merchant trying to approach with unclean hands and gain illegal order from Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana.

MS Manu Sharma And Company Vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 29 September, 2016

Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged MS Manu Sharma And Company Vs State Of Haryana And Ors Perjury - Approached Court with Unclean Hands Supressio Veri - Expression Faisi | Leave a comment

Moti Lal Songara Vs Prem Prakash @ Pappu & Anr on 16 May, 2013

Posted on June 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Hon’ble Apex court has clearly held that any order that got caused by suppression of information, any Court has an obligation to set aside the said order.

 

From Para 10,

…learned counsel for the appellant, has submitted that when the accused has not approached the court in clean hands and the High Court itself has observed that the order setting aside the order of cognisance was not justified, it should not have interfered with the order passed by the learned trial Judge declining to discharge the accused.

From Para 18,

The second limb of the submission is whether in the obtaining factual matrix, the order passed by the
High Court discharging the accused-respondent is justified in law. We have clearly stated that though the respondent was fully aware about the fact that charges had been framed against him by the learned trial Judge, yet he did not bring the same to the notice of the revisional court hearing the revision against the order taking cognizance. It is a clear case of suppression. It was within the special knowledge of the accused. Any one who takes recourse to method of suppression in a court of law, is, in actuality, playing fraud with the court, and the maxim supressio veri, expression faisi, i.e., suppression of the truth is equivalent to the expression of falsehood, gets attracted. We are compelled to say so as there has been a calculated concealment of the fact before the revisional court. It can be stated with certitude that the accused-respondent tried to gain advantage by such factual suppression. The fraudulent intention is writ large. In fact, he has shown his courage of ignorance and tried to play possum.

 

A victim of a crime has as much right to get justice from the court as an accused who enjoys the benefit of innocence till the allegations are proven against him. In the case at hand, when an order of quashment of summons has been obtained by suppression, this Court has an obligation to set aside the said order and restore the order framing charges and direct the trial to go on. And we so direct.

 

Moti Lal Songara vs Prem Prakash @ Pappu & Anr on 16 May, 2013

Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Moti Lal Songara Vs Prem Prakash Perjury - Approached Court with Unclean Hands Sandeep Pamarati Suppression Of Truth Supressio Veri - Expression Faisi | Leave a comment

Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs Kartick Das on 20 May, 1994

Posted on June 23, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Awesome judgment from Hon’ble Apex Court on when can a party be set ex parte.

 

As principle, ex parte injunction could be granted only under exceptional circumstances. The factors which should weigh with the court in the grant of ex parte injunction are –

(a) Whether irreparable or serious mischief will ensue to the plaintiff;

(b) whether the refusal of ex parte injunction would involve greater injustice than the grant of it would involve;

(c) the court will also consider the time at which the plaintiff first had notice of the act complained so that the making of the improper order against a party in his absence is prevented;

(d) the court will consider whether the plaintiff has acquiesced for sometime. In such circumstances it will not grant ex parte injunction;

(e) the court would expect a party applying for ex parte injunction to show utmost good faith in making the application;

(f) even if granted, the ex parte injunction would be for a limited period of time;

(g) general principles like, prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss would also be considered by the court.

Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs Kartick Das on 20 May, 1994
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Ex Parte Order Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs Kartick Das | Leave a comment

Nagaraj Kumar H.K. Vs Smt. Gangadevamma on 1 June, 2018

Posted on June 23, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Wonderful case of mischief done by Mother-out-law on a Son-in-law and how royally, her cover is blown.

Read it for it’s entertainment value.

Nagaraj Kumar H.K. Vs Smt. Gangadevamma on 1 June, 2018 - Order
Read more
Posted in District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 357 - Order to pay compensation Perjury - Approached Court with Unclean Hands S138 of NI Act | Leave a comment

CrPC 357 – Order to pay compensation

Posted on June 22, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

357. Order to pay compensation

(1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied-

(a) in defraying the expenses properly incurred in the prosecution;
(b) in the payment to any person of compensation for any loss or injury caused by the offence, when compensation is, in the opinion of the Court, recoverable by such person in a Civil Court;
(c) when any person is convicted of any offence for having caused the death of another person or of having abetted the commission of such an offence, in paying compensation to the persons who are, under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (13 of 1855 ), entitled to recover damages from the person sentenced for the loss resulting to them from such death;
(d) when any person is convicted of any offence which includes theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen, in compensating any bona fide purchaser of such property for the loss of the same if such property is restored to the possession of the person entitled thereto.
(2) If the fine is imposed in a case which is subject to appeal, no such payment shall be made before the period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal be presented, before the decision of the appeal.
(3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced.
(4) An order under this section may also be made by an Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of Session when exercising its powers of revision.
(5) At the time of awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the Court shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation under this section.
Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged CrPC 357 - Order to pay compensation | Leave a comment

Gali Lakshmi Vs Gali Venkaiah on 30 August, 2017

Posted on June 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this Ex Parte Order under DV Act at Nellore Court, Judge has allowed Maintenance “on account of acts of desertion by the respondent”

 

Gali Lakshmi Vs Gali Venkaiah on 30 August, 2017
Posted in Nellore DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order Gali Lakshmi Vs Gali Venkaiah PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance From Date of Application Or Petition PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts
  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
noconversion

No Conversion

@noconversion ·
27 Aug

When 100% of rituals are Hindu .. why did you convert?

Reply on Twitter 2092805929095856498 Retweet on Twitter 2092805929095856498 2371 Like on Twitter 2092805929095856498 8823 X 2092805929095856498
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
satyakumar_y

Satya Kumar Yadav

Verified account @satyakumar_y ·
27 Aug

Difference between UPA and the Modi Govt..!

Reply on Twitter 2092822937263059248 Retweet on Twitter 2092822937263059248 941 Like on Twitter 2092822937263059248 3257 X 2092822937263059248
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
rekha_9999

Rekha

@rekha_9999 ·
26 Aug

ముందు ప్రాజెక్ట్ పేరు తెలుసుకోండి @ysjagan

పూల సుబ్బయ్య వెలిగొండ ప్రాజెక్ట్ , ఈ “వెంకట” ఎక్కడి నుంచి వచ్చింది?

మీరు చేసిన డ్రామాలు, నీళ్లు వచ్చినట్టు బిల్డప్‌ ప్రజలకు బాగా అర్థమైంది

1996లో CBN మొదలుపెట్టారు, ఇప్పుడు ఆయనే పూర్తి చేస్తున్నారు.
#VeligondaProject

Reply on Twitter 2092620453806244053 Retweet on Twitter 2092620453806244053 104 Like on Twitter 2092620453806244053 382 X 2092620453806244053
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
jix5a

JIX5A

Verified account @jix5a ·
27 Aug

India once grew 100,000 rice varieties until the Green Revolution cut it to a handful.
But these seed saver banks are fighting to bring them back:
In 1997, ecologist Debal Deb founded Vrihi, Sanskrit for rice, after resigning from his job and settling in a remote village to start

Reply on Twitter 2092767431806648550 Retweet on Twitter 2092767431806648550 903 Like on Twitter 2092767431806648550 2694 X 2092767431806648550

Recent Posts

  • Vishnu Kumar Shukla and Anr Vs State of UP and Anr on 28 Nov 2023 August 28, 2026
  • Sharif Ahmed and Anr Vs State of UP and Anr on 01 May 2024 August 23, 2026
  • Antics of Advocates in India August 14, 2026
  • Antics of Police Personnel in India August 14, 2026
  • Application for Closure of Prosecution Evidence – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft August 6, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation (5,241 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (3,360 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (2,705 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case – Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (2,274 views)
  • Can You Travel Abroad After an FIR Is Registered? – Legal Position Explained (2,255 views)
  • Life Cycle of a Perjury Case (2,221 views)
  • Application for Certified Copy of FIR – Format, Procedure and Sample Draft (1,964 views)
  • Appeal, Revision and Review Explained (1,894 views)
  • Life Cycle Stages of a Restitution of Conjugal Rights Case (1,814 views)
  • BNSS Sec 530 - Trial and proceedings to be held in electronic mode (1,754 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (441)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (427)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (388)Landmark Case (384)1-Judge Bench Decision (370)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (300)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (91)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC (70)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (62)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (44)CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents (43)HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court (42)Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground (42)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (762)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (329)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (187)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (167)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (95)Legal Procedure (84)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (71)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (63)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (53)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (53)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (47)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (47)Prakasam DV Cases (46)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (28)

Recent Comments

  • pradeep jain on How to Challenge Ex Parte Orders in Criminal and Matrimonial Proceedings – Legal Remedies
  • Lawyer Sonia on Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC)
  • vinod gupta on Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation
  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases – Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case

Archives of SoK

  • August 2026 (5)
  • July 2026 (19)
  • June 2026 (19)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS feed: Cloudflare Status Cloudflare Status

  • DUB (Dublin) on 2026-09-10 September 10, 2026
    Aug 27, 13:20 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in DUB (Dublin) datacenter on 2026-09-10 between 02:00 and 05:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for end-users in the affected region. For PNI / CNI customers […]
    Cloudflare

RSS feed: List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 91.218.169.86 | SD August 27, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 839 | First: 2011-05-17 | Last: 2026-08-27
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati and Advocate Suprajaa Rajan
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 283 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel