web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Author: ShadesOfKnife

P.Sugunamma And Others Vs State Of A.P. on 19 January, 2015

Posted on October 15, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is a quash judgment from Hon’ble High of Andhra Pradesh, wherein the DVC on relatives of husband are quashed on grounds that there is ‘no shared household’ and ‘no domestic relationship’ conditions.

5. ( i) Coming back to the facts of the case, all the petitioners are residents of Prakasam District whereas the respondent is a resident of Hyderabad. There is nothing on record to show that the present petitioners had any domestic relationship and lived together with the 2nd respondent in a shared household at any point of time. Further after the proceedings in Crime No.204 of 2010 were quashed by this Court, by orders dated 04.10.2012, the present DV case is filed by the 2nd respondent.
6 . Viewed thus, this Court finds that the petitioners have made out valid and sufficient grounds to quash the proceedings against them in D.V.C.No.18 of 2012 on the file of VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Consequently, the proceedings against the petitioners herein in D.V.C.No.18 of 2012 on the file of VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District are hereby quashed.

P.Sugunamma And Others Vs State Of A.P. on 19 January, 2015

Indiankanoon.org link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/196776515/

Citation:


Earlier 498a case that was quashed is available here.


The index page is here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 498A Case Dismissed Earlier No Domestic Relationship Exists No Shared Household P.Sugunamma And Others Vs State Of A.P. PWDV Act - DV Case Quashed Same Allegations in IPC 498A and DVC Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

Mukesh & Anr Vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017

Posted on October 7, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

These are the appeals filed by the accused in Nirbhaya (Jyoti Singh) gang rape case dismissed by Apex Court.

Mukesh & Anr Vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Landmark Case Mukesh and Anr Vs State For NCT Of Delhi and Ors Nirbhaya Rape Case | Leave a comment

Esha Bhattacharjee Vs Mg.Commit.Of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy and others on 13 September, 2013

Posted on October 6, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Landmark judgment of Apex Court giving guidelines or principles to adhere to while condoning delay in appeals.

Esha Bhattacharjee Vs Mg.Commit.Of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy and others on 13 September, 2013
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Condone Delay In Appeals Filed Esha Bhattacharjee Vs Mg.Commit.Of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy and others Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

Dr. Harbans Singh Sodhi Vs State of Punjab and others on 14 May, 2018

Posted on October 5, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this dismissal order from High Court of Punjab and Haryana, it was held that, it is premature to file a compensation claim while the trial is in pendency.

Having heard learned counsel at length and having perused the case paper book we are of the considered view that there is no merit in the instant appeal.
Concededly trial is still pending. Even otherwise registration of an FIR is not a conclusive indicator as regards complicity of an accused of the offences cited in the FIR. Appellant has not been charged for offence under Section 376 IPC. We also find that in the writ petition filed by the appellant seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus for grant of compensation, complainant had not even been arrayed as a respondent.
We are in agreement with the view taken by learned Single Judge declining grant of compensation during pendency of the trial.
Appeal is dismissed.
Suffice it to observe that it would be open for the appellant to raise a claim for compensation at the appropriate stage under Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure from the competent Court.

Dr. Harbans Singh Sodhi Vs State of Punjab and others on 14 May, 2018
Posted in High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 357 - Compensation Denied As Premature CrPC 357 - Order to pay compensation Dr. Harbans Singh Sodhi Vs State of Punjab and others | Leave a comment

In no case, is arrest compulsory

Posted on October 4, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife
In no case, is arrest compulsory
Posted in General Study Material | Tagged Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes | Leave a comment

Kodungallur Film Society vs Union Of India on 1 October, 2018

Posted on October 4, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Hon’ble Supreme Court issued directions to the States/Union of India to strictly implement the decision rendered by this Court in here, concerning the large-scale destruction of properties in the name of agitations, bandhs, hartals etc. and levy fine and grant compensation to the victims of such mob-violence.

Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India on 01 October, 2018

Indiankanoon.org version is available below.

Kodungallur Film Society vs Union Of India on 1 October, 2018 (indiankanoon.org)
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Grant Compensation To Victims Of Mob-violence Kodungallur Film Society vs Union Of India | Leave a comment

Destruction of Public and Private Properties Vs State of A.P. and Ors on 16 April 2009

Posted on October 4, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Dr Arijit Pasayat has delivered this wonderful judgment from Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Destruction of Public & Private Properties Vs State of A.P. and Ors. on 16 April, 2009

Citations: [2

Other Source links:


Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from main.sci.gov.in/judgments, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Destruction of Public and Private Properties Vs State of A.P. and Ors. Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Jagruti Shashikant Soni Vs State Of Gujarat on 26 September, 2018

Posted on October 4, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Weird case disposed off by High Court of Gujarat !!!

Sections included in the FIR by police are: Sections 498-A, 509, 342, 504, 506, 427, 34 etc. of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act.

From Para 5 and 5.1,

At the outset, it is submitted that the parties have amicably resolved the issue and therefore, any further continuance of the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR as well as any further proceedings arising therefrom would create hardship to the applicants. It is submitted that respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit in these proceedings and has declared that the dispute between the applicants and respondent No.2 is resolved due to intervention of trusted persons of the society.

Learned advocate for the applicants states that matter is settled between the parties.

Despite it having POCSO applied, What does the below infer? It’s a screaming fake case, wherein the provisions of a penal act, were grossly and brazenly, misused by none other that the knife.

Jagruti Shashikant Soni Vs State Of Gujarat on 26 September, 2018

 

Posted in High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 482 - Quash CrPC 482 – FIR Quashed FIR Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement Jagruti Shashikant Soni Vs State Of Gujarat | Leave a comment

Swapnil Tripathi Vs Supreme Court of India on 26 September, 2018

Posted on October 3, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is the landmark judgment from Apex Court, for live streaming of the court proceedings of the Supreme Court in a phased manner and the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 will have to be suitably amended to provide for the regulatory framework.

Swapnil Tripathi Vs Supreme Court of India on 26 September. 2018

 

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty Landmark Case Live Streaming Of Court Proceedings Swapnil Tripathi Vs Supreme Court of India | Leave a comment

Youth Bar Association of India Vs UOI on 7 Sep 2016

Posted on October 2, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is the landmark judgment from Hon’ble Supreme Court wherein directions were issued to Home Secretaries and DGPs of all States.

The complete directions are given below

(a) An accused is entitled to get a copy of the First Information Report at an earlier stage than as prescribed under Section 207 of the Cr.P.C.
(b) An accused who has reasons to suspect that he has been roped in a criminal case and his name may be finding place in a First Information Report can submit an application through his representative/agent/parokar for grant of a certified copy before the concerned police officer or to the Superintendent of Police on payment of such fee which is payable for obtaining such a copy from the Court. On such application being made, the copy shall be supplied within twenty-four hours.
(c) Once the First Information Report is forwarded by the police station to the concerned Magistrate or any Special Judge, on an application being filed for certified copy on behalf of the accused, the same shall be given by the Court concerned within two working days. The aforesaid direction has nothing to do with the statutory mandate inhered under Section 207 of the Cr.P.C.
(d) The copies of the FIRs, unless the offence is sensitive in nature, like sexual offences, offences pertaining to insurgency, terrorism and of that category, offences under POCSO Act and such other offences, should be uploaded on the police website, and if there is no such website, on the official website of the State Government, within twenty-four hours of the registration of the First Information Report so that the accused or any person connected with the same can download the FIR and file appropriate application before the Court as per law for redressal of his grievances. It may be clarified here that in case there is connectivity problems due to geographical location or there is some other unavoidable difficulty, the time can be extended up to forty-eight hours. The said 48 hours can be extended maximum up to 72 hours and it is only relatable to connectivity problems due to geographical location.
(e) The decision not to upload the copy of the FIR on the website shall not be taken by an officer below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or any person holding equivalent post. In case, the States where District Magistrate has a role, he may also assume the said authority. A decision taken by the concerned police officer or the District Magistrate shall be duly communicated to the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate.
(f) The word ‘sensitive’ apart from the other aspects which may be thought of being sensitive by the competent authority as stated hereinbefore would also include concept of privacy regard being had to the nature of the FIR. The examples given with regard to the sensitive cases are absolutely illustrative and are not exhaustive.
(g) If an FIR is not uploaded, needless to say, it shall not enure per se a ground to obtain the benefit under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
(h) In case a copy of the FIR is not provided on the ground of sensitive nature of the case, a person grieved by the said action, after disclosing his identity, can submit a representation to the Superintendent of Police or any person holding the equivalent post in the State. The Superintendent of Police shall constitute a committee of three officers which shall deal with the said grievance. As far as the Metropolitan cities are concerned, where Commissioner is there, if a representation is submitted to the Commissioner of Police who shall constitute a committee of three officers. The committee so constituted shall deal with the grievance within three days from the date of receipt of the representation and communicate it to the grieved person.
(i) The competent authority referred to hereinabove shall constitute the committee, as directed herein-above, within eight weeks from today.
(j) In cases wherein decisions have been taken not to give copies of the FIR regard being had to the sensitive nature of the case, it will be open to the accused/his authorized representative/parokar to file an application for grant of certified copy before the Court to which the FIR has been sent and the same shall be provided in quite promptitude by the concerned Court not beyond three days of the submission of the application.
(k) The directions for uploading of FIR in the website of all the States shall be given effect from 15th November, 2016.

Youth Bar Association of India Vs UOI on 7 September, 2016

Citations: [2016 SCC ONLINE SC 914], [2017 ELT SC 345 434], [2016 SCC 9 473], [2016 SCC CRI 3 691], [2016 AIR SC 4136], [2016 CTC 5 571], [2016 KLT 3 1035]

Other Sources:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/151036912/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/58117e6a2713e17947889bcf

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2016/09/08/firs-to-be-uploaded-on-the-police-website-or-official-website-of-the-government-concerned-from-15th-november-2016/


Here is the Petition copy.

WRIT-PETITIONCRIMINAL-NO-68-OF-2016-1
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Reportable Judgement or Order Sandeep Pamarati Upload FIR Within 24 Hours Youth Bar Association of India Vs UOI | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts
  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
rapidresponse47

Rapid Response 47

Verified account @rapidresponse47 ·
8 Oct

.@Sonderling47: "I am hereby suspending from the Permanent Labor Certification Program some of the largest IT outsourcing firms in the world — Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Capgemini — and also, due to multiple active federal investigations, @USDOL is suspending

Reply on Twitter 2108205448063037667 Retweet on Twitter 2108205448063037667 5334 Like on Twitter 2108205448063037667 34113 X 2108205448063037667
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
khaidino6093

Khaidi No 6093

@khaidino6093 ·
8 Oct

గాంజా మొక్క కి ప్రేమ పొంగి పొరలుతుంది ఆంద్రోళ్ళమీద!
#khaidino6093 #ysjagan

Reply on Twitter 2108118042937045232 Retweet on Twitter 2108118042937045232 123 Like on Twitter 2108118042937045232 460 X 2108118042937045232
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
khaidino6093

Khaidi No 6093

@khaidino6093 ·
8 Oct

జగన్.. మతం అయిన మారు. నీ పేరు అయినా మార్చుకో..!
#khaidino6093 #ysjagan

Reply on Twitter 2108147120041836970 Retweet on Twitter 2108147120041836970 181 Like on Twitter 2108147120041836970 788 X 2108147120041836970
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
i_am_with_cbn

AP with CBN

Verified account @i_am_with_cbn ·
7 Oct

Robotics in Vijayawada Government School

🔥🔥🔥

#GovernmentSchools #AndhraPradesh

Reply on Twitter 2107660510992732175 Retweet on Twitter 2107660510992732175 49 Like on Twitter 2107660510992732175 190 X 2107660510992732175

Recent Posts

  • When did Anantapur become Ananthapuramu? October 9, 2026
  • Supreme Court: PF and employee share-plan deductions cannot shrink the income used to assess child maintenance September 29, 2026
  • Pradeep Ram Vs State of Jharkhand and Anr on 1 Jul 2019 September 24, 2026
  • Video Conferencing Links of District Judiciary of Andhra Pradesh September 24, 2026
  • Practical Solutions Inc Vs State of Telangana and Ors on 19 Jan 2026 September 24, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • How Courts Quash Omnibus Allegations in Matrimonial FIRs - Case Study (1,587 views)
  • Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate on 19 May 2026 (1,196 views)
  • Application for Exemption from Personal Appearance During Investigation – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (1,084 views)
  • Application for Modification of Bail Conditions – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (961 views)
  • Myth vs Reality: Bail in 498A Cases – Legal Position Explained (939 views)
  • Exemption Application Under Section 205 CrPC – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (900 views)
  • Representation for Deletion of Name from FIR – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (890 views)
  • Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026 (819 views)
  • Life Cycle Stages of a Criminal Writ Petition Before a High Court (777 views)
  • Dr. Garima Dubey and Ors Vs Dr. Saurabh Anand Dubey on 21 Apr 2026 - Judgement Summary (738 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (446)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (431)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (389)Landmark Case (387)1-Judge Bench Decision (376)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (302)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (102)Sandeep Pamarati (92)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (72)Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC (71)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (62)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (44)CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents (43)Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court (43)HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground (42)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (767)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (329)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (190)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (167)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (95)Legal Procedure (85)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (71)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (63)LLB Study Material (60)General Study Material (56)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (54)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (53)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (48)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (47)Prakasam DV Cases (46)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (29)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (28)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on How to Challenge Ex Parte Orders in Criminal and Matrimonial Proceedings – Legal Remedies
  • pradeep jain on How to Challenge Ex Parte Orders in Criminal and Matrimonial Proceedings – Legal Remedies
  • Lawyer Sonia on Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC)
  • vinod gupta on Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation
  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases – Complete Legal Strategy

Archives of SoK

  • October 2026 (1)
  • September 2026 (13)
  • August 2026 (6)
  • July 2026 (19)
  • June 2026 (19)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS feed: Cloudflare Status Cloudflare Status

  • AMD (Ahmedabad) on 2026-11-02 November 2, 2026
    Oct 8, 16:40 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in AMD (Ahmedabad) datacenter between 2026-11-02 21:00 and 2026-11-03 01:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for end-users in the affected region. For PNI / CNI customers […]
    Cloudflare Status

RSS feed: List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 34.13.216.103 | S October 8, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 4 | First: 2025-07-09 | Last: 2026-10-08
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati and Advocate Suprajaa Rajan
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 889 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel