Here is the Amendment Act to Andhra Pradesh Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act, 2002 here.
Index of all Acts and Rules are here.
Here is the Haryana Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act, 2008 which has compulsory marriage registration u/s
6. Every Marriage to be registered — After the commencement of this Act every marriage solemnized in the State irrespective of caste, religion and creed, shall be registered in the manner as provided in section 7.
Index of all Acts and Rules are here.
This is the enactment which mandates compulsory registration of Marriages in Andhra Pradesh u/s
Section 7.(1) After the commencement of Act, every marriage performed in the State shall be registered under this Act in the manner provided in section 8 notwithstanding the fact the said marriage had been entered in the Marriage Registers governed by the any other personal laws of the bride or bridegroom or customs and traditions.
(2) This Act does not apply to the Marriages already registered with the Registrar of Marriages appointed by the Government.
The 2018 Amendment is here.
Index of all Acts and Rules are here.
This is the case of a casanova Judge who danced to the tunes of a Lady Advocate and landed in Trashbin as a result. Haha
The Bombay High Court judgment below lays bare the kaands of the casanova and the consequences.
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
This Transfer Petition at Supreme Court led to the directions to States and Union Territories to make registration of marriages compulsory in India. The following are the key Orders.
On 14 February 2006, Directions given to States and Union Territories to make registration of marriages compulsory in India
On 25 October 2007, further directions were issued.
“The directions given by the order dated 24.2.2006 have not been fully complied with. We, therefore, direct that the States and Union Territories who have not acted in line with the directions given on 14.2.2006 shall forthwith do it and in no case later than three months from today.“
On 9 July 2008, again Apex Court gave 4 months time to comply with directions.
“Let all the States and Union Territories who have not given specific details, file affidavits within four months from today.“
On 1 May 2019, Office Report was put up and the same is here.
On 1 May 2019, Transfer petition is disposed off.
The transfer petition has not been answered and the matrimonial suit in question has remained stayed since 15.4.2005. The fate of the said matrimonial suit as on date and the interest of the parties in pursuing the matter is not known to us, as none has appeared on behalf of the original contesting parties. The judicial exercise after 14.2.2006 has been to monitor implementation of the directions of the said date, as extracted above. The materials on record would indicate that most of the States barring a few have framed suitable legislations. In any event, in terms of the order dated 15.4.2005, such of the States that have not framed legislations, will be governed by the directions contained in the order dated 14.2.2006.
Taking into account the above facts, we are of the view that no worthwhile purpose will be served by keeping these proceedings pending before this Court. We accordingly close the said proceedings and vacate the interim order dated 15.4.2005, so far as the stay of Matrimonial Suit No. 104/2004 is concerned.
Citations: [2006 ALLMR SC 2 11], [2006 AIR BOMR 2 783], [2006 AIOL 84], [2006 SCR 2 220], [2006 AIR SC 1158], [2006 BOMCR SC 2 497], [2006 AIR SC 858], [2006 SCALE 2 333], [2006 ANJ SC 2 144], [2006 SUPREME 2 66], [2006 JT 2 378], [2006 SCC 2 578], [2006 CUTLT 101 639], [2006 DLT 127 282], [2006 KERLT 1 791]
Other Source links: https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609ae30e4b01497114131d8 or https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1037437/
Here are the Compulsory Marriage Registration Acts and Rules along with sample Registration forms of all States and Union Territories of India.
Supreme Court of India has, in its order dated 14th February, 2006 in Transfer Petition (C) no. 291 of 2005 has directed all states to frame rules with respect to the compulsory registration of marriages. Final Disposal Judgment is here along with all earlier orders.
MASTER SITEMAP here.
Here are the Bihar Marriage Registration Rules, 2006 which has compulsory marriage registration u/s
3. Registration of Marriages— Every couple shall get their marriage compulsorily registered before the Marriage Registrar within 30 days of solemnization of their marriage, in accordance with the procedure as laid down under Rule 5 of these Rules.
Provided that in case of marriage not getting registered within 30 days for some reason it may be got registered thereafter after paying the penalty as laid down in Rule 9(1) of these Rules.
Index of all Acts and Rules are here.
In this Judgment from Supreme Court, it was held that education of knife is not a consideration to decide interim maintenance. What the fcuk?? Whatever happened to Nari_MyFoot_Shakti?
From Para 15,
An order for maintenance pendente lite or for costs of the proceedings is conditional on the circumstance that the wife or husband who makes a claim for the same has no independent income sufficient for her or his support or to meet the necessary expenses of the proceeding. It is no answer to a claim of maintenance that the wife is educated and could support herself. Likewise, the financial position of the wife’s parents is also immaterial. The Court must take into consideration the status of the parties and the capacity of the spouse to pay maintenance and whether the applicant has any independent income sufficient for her or his support. Maintenance is always dependent upon factual situation; the Court should, therefore, mould the claim for maintenance determining the quantum based on various factors brought before the Court.
Haha, the threats of SC Judge… LOLwa
In case the appellant-husband does not comply with the order, as above, including for payment of arrears, he would be visited with all consequences including action for contempt of Court.
Bad Behavior has blocked 324 access attempts in the last 7 days.