In any case where the proceeding has been instituted on a police report, the Magistrate shall without delay furnish to the accused, free of cost, a copy of each of the following:—
(i) the police report;
(ii) the first information report recorded under section 154;
(iii) the statements recorded under sub-section (3) of section 161 of all persons whom the prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses, excluding therefrom any part in regard to which a request for such exclusion has been made by the police officer under sub-section (6) of section 173;
(iv) the confessions and statements, if any, recorded under section 164;
(v) any other document or relevant extract thereof forwarded to the Magistrate with the police report under sub-section (5) of section 173:
Provided that the Magistrate may, after perusing any such part of a statement as is referred to in clause (iii) and considering the reasons given by the police officer for the request, direct that a copy of that part of the statement or of such portion thereof as the Magistrate thinks proper, shall be furnished to the accused:
Provided further that if the Magistrate is satisfied that any document referred to in clause (v) is voluminous, he shall, instead of furnishing the accused with a copy thereof, direct that he will only be allowed to inspect it either personally or through pleader in Court.
Author: ShadesOfKnife
L. Krishna Reddy Vs State on 24 October 2013
Citations: [2013 BOMCR CRI SC 4 608], [2014 JLJR SC 1 75], [2013 AIR SC 6202], [2014 SCC 14 401], [2013 SUPREME 7 765], [2014 RCR CRIMINAL SC 1 140], [2013 SCALE 13 259], [2013 AIOL 708], [2015 SCC CRI 1 376], [2013 CRIMES SC 4 485], [2013 SCC ONLINE SC 957], [2013 AIC 132 33], [2014 CUTLT 117 975], [2013 AIR SC SUPP 423], [2013 ALLCC 83 947], [2014 NCC 1 280], [2014 CCR SC 1 9], [2014 SCJ 3 735], [2014 DMC 1 107], [2013 JT SC 14 543], [2014 OLR 1 323], [2014 CLT 117 975], [2014 UC 1 59], [2013 MLJ CRI 4 535]
Other Source links:
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/47377728/
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609af3de4b0149711415e9f
Index of Discharge Judgments u/s 227 are here.
Video Conferencing Guidelines of Courts in India
CrPC 205 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused
(1) Whenever a Magistrate issues a summons, he may, if he sees reason so to do, dispense with the personal attendance of the accused and permit him to appear by his pleader.
(2) But the Magistrate inquiring into or trying the case may, in his discretion, at any stage of the proceedings, direct the personal attendance of the accused, and, if necessary, enforce such attendance in the manner hereinbefore provided.
Corresponding provision in CrPC is here.
High Court of Delhi Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020
Delhi High Court has opened it’s proceedings to Public in a structured manner via this Circular.
DHC has issued these Rules on 01 June 2020.
Here are Comprehensive guidelines issued in December 2019.
Basavaraj R. Patil and Ors Vs State of Karnataka and Ors on 11 October 2000
Citations: [2000 AIR SC 3214], [2000 CRIMES SC 4 79], [2000 CRLJ SC 4604], [2001 BOMCR CRI SC 81], [2000 AIR SC 3692], [2000 SCALE 6 697], [2000 JT SUPP 1 422], [2000 SUPREME 6 586], [2000 SCC 8 740], [2001 SCC CRI 87], [2000 ACR SC 3 2553], [2001 CGLJ 1 53], [2001 PLJR 1 112], [2001 UC 1 79], [2001 LW CRL 1 1], [2000 CRILJ 4604], [2001 ALT CRI 1 40], [2000 JT SUPPL SC 1 422], [2000 ALD CRI 2 843], [2000 SUPP SCR 3 658]
Other Source links: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/445635/
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609ad81e4b014971141183f
Lanka Venkata Subrahmanyam Vs State of Telangana on 4 January 2018
Baseless case against Secretary to Government LV Subrahmanyam was quashed by AP High Court.
Citations: [
Other Source links:
Sameer Saxena Vs State and Anr on 07 March 2011
After failure at Delhi High Court here, Supreme Court dismissed the SLP summarily. Sad!
Chitranjan Dev Goel and Ors Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors on 21 March 2016
Basing on the Pooja Saxena case here, Parents of women who were alleged to have committed the crime of giving dowry were let free.
Citations: [2016 SCC ONLINE DEL 2130], [2016 DLT CN B 229 30]
Other Source links:
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134987777/
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5728e42ee56109277ee48517
https://www.quickcompany.in/judgements/judgement-7b760d46-8b0b-48bd-9a45-794161ac3e2c
Viral Dhulia Vs Virag Dhulia on 25 July 2013
Because of the allegation of Dowry giving are made by married women, husbands are resorting to these kind of hyperbolic tricks which fall flat on their face. Instead of hitting at the root cause, peripheral aspects are stroked only to be later quashed like this.
Citations: [2013 KCCR 4 3137], [2013 AKR 4 454], [2014 ILR KAR 199], [2013 SCC ONLINE KAR 5387], [2013 AIR KANT R 4 45]
Other Source links:
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56094831e4b01497112656fb
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/140258661/
https://www.legitquest.com/case/viral-goda-viral-dhulia-others-v-virag-r-dhulia-another/DDF53
https://www.lawyerservices.in/Mrs-Viral-Goda–Viral-Dhulia-and-Others-Versus-Virag-R-Dhulia-and-Another-2013-07-25
Upon filing SLP before Supreme Court, it was dismissed summarily with the following Order.
Delay condoned.
Heard. We find no merit in the case.
The special leave petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.20,000/- to be paid in favour of respondent no. 2 within eight weeks.
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/148303036/