web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Author: ShadesOfKnife

Ashok Roopchand Jain Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors on 04 Mar 2020

Posted on September 16, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Another good judgment based on landmark rulings from DB of Bombay High Court as well as Apex Court, on renewal of a Passport for full term of 10 years.

6. In view of the directions given by this Court in the said judgment, therefore, the Respondents were duty bound to follow the said directions and ought to have renewed thepassport for a period of ten years. It has to be borne in mind that whenever a criminal complaint is pending against an applicant, who wishes to travel abroad, the Magistrate alone has a jurisdiction to impose conditions regarding his right to travel abroad. If the Magistrate is satisfied that the Applicant should not be permitted to travel abroad, he can reject his application. However, when an application is made forrenewal of passport, the Passport Authorities have to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder. It appears that the Central Government has issued a Notification by exercising a power vested in them under section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967 and in the said Notification, it has been mentioned that the passport can be renewed for a period of one year. There being an ambiguity under the provisions of the Act and the Rules and the Notification issued by the Passport Authorities, this Court was pleased to clarify the said ambiguity in the case of Narendra Ambwani (supra). The Passport Authorities do not have the right to decide whether the accused has a right to travel abroad or not and that right is vested in the Magistrate, who can impose condition if an application is made, seeking permission to travel abroad. The Apex Court in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [(1978) 1 SCC 248 : 1978 SCR (2) 621)] has held that the right to travel for the purpose of business and service is a part of a fundamental right, subject to reasonable restrictions, which are imposed by the Act and by the Court. In the present case, the Applicant on account of his service as a Flight Person has to travel abroad continuously and there is no possibility of absconding since he has to return back along with the fight. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, we direct the Passport Authorities to renew the passport for a period of 10 years. It is clarified that, however, the Applicant will have to apply to the Magistrate seeking permission to travel abroad. If such an application is made, the Magistrate may impose such conditions as deem ft and proper.”

Ashok Roopchand Jain Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors on 04 Mar 2020
Posted in High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Ashok Roopchand Jain Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors Maneka Gandhi Vs Union Of India Passport Renewal for 10 Years | Leave a comment

Dammalapati Srinivas Vs State of AP

Posted on September 16, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

The following is the interim Stay order granted by High Court of AP against all further investigation into the alleged Land scam. A gag order was also passed by the Court in reporting on this case to all media as well as Social Media, since the alleged complaint implicates the two girl-children of sitting Supreme Court Judge.

WP.16468/2020

Dammalapati Srinivas Vs State of AP on 15 Sep 2020

As is usual, the Stay order was challenged at Supreme Court and the gag order was Stayed by Supreme Court here.


Finally, the false cases were quashed like dirt and thrown out of window. Now, as is the tradition, the cabal will move the Division Bench and then beg at SCI.

Dammalapati Srinivas Vs State of AP on 02 Sep 2021

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YCP are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Dammalapati Srinivas Vs State of AP Insider Trading Allegation Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

Abhilasha Vs Parkash and Ors on 15 Sep 2020

Posted on September 16, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

The major-daughter here tried to grab maintenance from father under 125 CrPC showing that father has such responsibility under HAMA. Supreme Court said no-no.

Abhilasha Vs Parkash and Ors on 15 Sep 2020
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision Abhilasha Vs Parkash and Ors CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Denied | Leave a comment

Kantamneni Ravi Shankar Vs State of AP

Posted on September 12, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Kantamneni Ravi Shankar, MD of TeluguOne media organization was booked in a baseless crime by AP CID and then Single-judge bench sufficiently gave lecture to the Police on Duties of Police.

Kantamaneni Ravishankar Vs State of AP on 28 Aug 2020

4 months earlier, Anticipatory Bail was also granted to this Petitioner:

Kantamneni Ravi Shankar Vs State of AP on 17 May 2020

The genesis of this and such nonsensical false criminal cases is this GO:

2019GAD_RT2430 Lodge complaints and legal cases against false, baseless and defamatory news items published in Print, Electronic and Social Media

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YCP are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to Kantamneni Ravi Shankar Vs State of AP Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and others

Posted on September 11, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Advocate Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya had filed this Writ Petition way back in 2016 (2016-09-06) and still the Supreme Court is working on it.

 

On 2020-03-05:

A 13-column format was finalized to be filled by High Courts, as not many High Courts supplied Amicus with required information. Amicus email id is given wherein the Crime data was to be sent.

Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and others on 05 Mar 2020

On 2020-08-31:

Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and Ors on 31 Aug 2020

 


On 2020-09-10:

Submission of the Amicus Curiae:

Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and others

Order from Court:

Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and others on 10 Sep 2020

On 2020-09-16:

Directions were passed to CJs of High Courts for monitoring and expediting the disposal of the criminal cases.

Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and Ors on 16 Sep 2020

On 2020-10-06:

Supplementary Submission of the Amicus Curiae:

Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and Ors Supp Report

On 2020-11-02:

Supplementary Submission (12th Report) of the Amicus Curiae:

2020-11-02 Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and Ors Report_compressed

On 2020-11-02:

Further directions were passed by the Court

2020-11-04 Ashwani Kumar Upadhyaya Vs Union of India and Ors

On 2021-08-10:

In view of the law laid down by this Court, we deem it appropriate to direct that no prosecution against a sitting or former M.P./M.L.A. shall be withdrawn without the leave of the High Court in the respective suo-motu writ petitions registered in pursuance of our order dated 16.09.2020. The High Courts are requested to examine the withdrawals, whether pending or disposed of since 16.09.2020, in light of guidelines laid down by this Court.

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Vs UOI and Anr on 10 Aug 2021

On 2021-08-11:

The table given in previous day order was amended to include new column, ‘Whether Video Conferencing facility is available’.

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Vs UOI and Anr on 11 Aug 2021

On 2021-08-25:

This is the 14th Status Report by Amicus Curiae:

2021-08-24 14th-amicus-report-filed-on-24082021

Here is the Order passed.

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Vs UOI and Anr on 25 Aug 2021
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Vs Union of India and Ors Landmark Case Public Interest Litigation | Leave a comment

Karanam Srinivasulu Vs State of AP on 1 September 2020

Posted on September 10, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

High Court ordered the Government to implement G.O.No.411 in letter and spirit and the action of the State in registering the crime on the ground that the alcohol is brought into Andhra Pradesh from the neighboring State is held to be bad in law. Per G.O.No.426, 6 bottles of Beer was reduced to 3 bottles.

Karanam Srinivasulu Vs State of AP on 1 September 2020

G.O.Ms.No.411 dt: 2019-09-24

2019-09-24 2019REV_MS411 Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Maximum quantity of intoxicants that a person can possess without permit or licence

G.O.Ms.No.426 dt: 2019-10-11

2019-10-11 2019REV_MS426 Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 – Maximum number of Beer bottles that a person can possess without permit or licence

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YCP are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to Karanam Srinivasulu Vs State of AP Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

Rajula Sahu Vs Principal Secretary on 8 September 2020

Posted on September 9, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

AP High Court Ordered the State government to make pension payments and ascertain the eligibility of the petitioners in Gram Sabha after giving opportunity to the petitioners.

Rajula Sahu Vs Principal Secretary on 8 September 2020

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YCP are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Rajula Sahu Vs Principal Secretary Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

Solomon Raju Manchala Vs Union of India

Posted on September 5, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

High Court issued notice to UOI on the appointment of N Harinath Reddy as ASG for AP High Court.

Solomon Raju Manchala Vs Union of India on 16 June 2020

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh Solomon Raju Manchala Vs Union of India | Leave a comment

Tata Power Renewable Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 24 September 2019

Posted on September 5, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Due to holding of payments to Renewable Energy Companies that entered into Power Purchase Agreements with State Government (under leadership of N Chandrababu Naidu) by YCP Government, High Court was petitioned to do Justice.

Tata Power Renewable Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 24 September 2019

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh Tata Power Renewable Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

MS Bandekar Brothers Pvt Ltd and Anr Vs Prasad Vassudev Keni on 2 September 2020

Posted on September 4, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Supreme Court held that for offences under 191 and 192 IPC, procedure under 340 CrPC has to be followed and perjury application for such offences cannot be turned into private complaints under 190 CrPC.

MS Bandekar Brothers Pvt Ltd and Anr Vs Prasad Vassudev Keni on 2 September 2020

Citations: [2020 SCC ONLINE SC 707], [(2020)20 SCC 1]

Other Sources:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/141105348/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5f567c183321bc6ce2ef6f51

https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/judgments/announcement.php?WID=13132

https://www.indianemployees.com/judgments/details/m-s-bandekar-brothers-pvt-ltd-anr-versus-prasad-vassudev-keni-etc-etc


Index of Perjury case laws is here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision CrPC 340 read with CrPC 195 Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes MS Bandekar Brothers Pvt Ltd and Anr Vs Prasad Vassudev Keni Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts
  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
ncbn

N Chandrababu Naidu

Verified account @ncbn ·
2 Oct

A heartfelt thank you to Anant Ambani Ji for coming forward to establish the Indian School of Agriculture in Rayalaseema, Andhra Pradesh.

Your commitment to empowering our farmers, strengthening agriculture and transforming Rayalaseema into a global horticulture hub is deeply

Reply on Twitter 2105992083903553676 Retweet on Twitter 2105992083903553676 1202 Like on Twitter 2105992083903553676 12388 X 2105992083903553676
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
m9news_

M9 NEWS

Verified account @m9news_ ·
2 Oct

నన్ను "ఆంధ్ర బిడ్డ"గా భావించండి!

Chandrababu Naidu garu.. Andhra Pradesh కోసం నేను ఏం చేయాలో చెప్పండి

- #AnantAmbani @ncbn

Reply on Twitter 2105911996160077995 Retweet on Twitter 2105911996160077995 1683 Like on Twitter 2105911996160077995 13030 X 2105911996160077995
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
telugu360

Telugu360

Verified account @telugu360 ·
2 Oct

నన్ను ఆంధ్ర బిడ్డగా భావించండి: అనంత్ అంబానీ

“Chandrababu Naidu Garu, today, I request you to treat me as a son of Andhra and direct me on how I can contribute to your beautiful state.”

#AnanthAmbani #Chandrababu

Reply on Twitter 2105912917908676893 Retweet on Twitter 2105912917908676893 1565 Like on Twitter 2105912917908676893 18868 X 2105912917908676893
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
iloveindia_007

I Love India ✌️

Verified account @iloveindia_007 ·
2 Oct

వెళ్ళోస్తాను బాబుగారు,ఆశీర్వదించండి🙏🙏....
సభ మొదలైన దగ్గర నుంచి వీడ్కోలు సమయం వరకు దాదాపు రెండున్నర గంటలు పైగా బాబుగారితో కలుపుకోలుగా,మర్యాదపూర్వకంగా మసలుకుంటూ ఆహూతులందరి మనస్సులు గెలిచిన"అనంత్ అంబానీ"గారు🥰🥰

Reply on Twitter 2106000399140532673 Retweet on Twitter 2106000399140532673 197 Like on Twitter 2106000399140532673 1603 X 2106000399140532673

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court: PF and employee share-plan deductions cannot shrink the income used to assess child maintenance September 29, 2026
  • Pradeep Ram Vs State of Jharkhand and Anr on 1 Jul 2019 September 24, 2026
  • Video Conferencing Links of District Judiciary of Andhra Pradesh September 24, 2026
  • Practical Solutions Inc Vs State of Telangana and Ors on 19 Jan 2026 September 24, 2026
  • Md. Mashood and Ors Vs State of UP and Ors on 25 Feb 2026 September 24, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Appeal, Revision and Review Explained (2,100 views)
  • How Courts Quash Omnibus Allegations in Matrimonial FIRs - Case Study (1,570 views)
  • Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate on 19 May 2026 (1,183 views)
  • Application for Exemption from Personal Appearance During Investigation – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (1,070 views)
  • Application for Modification of Bail Conditions – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (945 views)
  • Myth vs Reality: Bail in 498A Cases – Legal Position Explained (931 views)
  • Exemption Application Under Section 205 CrPC – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (889 views)
  • Representation for Deletion of Name from FIR – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (875 views)
  • Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026 (807 views)
  • Life Cycle Stages of a Criminal Writ Petition Before a High Court (770 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (446)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (431)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (389)Landmark Case (387)1-Judge Bench Decision (376)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (302)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (102)Sandeep Pamarati (92)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (72)Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC (71)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (62)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (44)CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents (43)Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court (43)HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground (42)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (767)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (329)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (190)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (167)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (95)Legal Procedure (85)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (71)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (63)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (54)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (53)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (48)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (47)Prakasam DV Cases (46)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (29)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (28)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on How to Challenge Ex Parte Orders in Criminal and Matrimonial Proceedings – Legal Remedies
  • pradeep jain on How to Challenge Ex Parte Orders in Criminal and Matrimonial Proceedings – Legal Remedies
  • Lawyer Sonia on Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC)
  • vinod gupta on Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation
  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases – Complete Legal Strategy

Archives of SoK

  • September 2026 (13)
  • August 2026 (6)
  • July 2026 (19)
  • June 2026 (19)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS feed: Cloudflare Status Cloudflare Status

  • MAA (Chennai) on 2026-10-29 October 29, 2026
    Sep 17, 17:11 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in MAA (Chennai) datacenter between 2026-10-29 21:00 and 2026-10-30 01:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for end-users in the affected region. For PNI / CNI customers […]
    Cloudflare Status

RSS feed: List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 35.185.160.147 | SD October 5, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 19 | First: 2026-08-02 | Last: 2026-10-05
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati and Advocate Suprajaa Rajan
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 2528 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel