<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShadesOfKnife, Author at Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/author/sokadm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/author/sokadm/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P. on 29 May 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – Criminal Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – FIR Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court passed this reportable judgment. &#160; From Para 10.2, 10.2 It is pertinent to underscore the important role played by the legal fraternity in bringing down the overall pendency of the cases in the Family Courts and criminal cases which are an adjunct to matrimonial disputes by weeding out unimportant [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/">Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P. on 29 May 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prabhakar Yeshwant Masram and Anr Vs Sou Tula Namdeorao Jaipurkar and Anr on 21 Jul 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prabhakar-yeshwant-masram-and-anr-vs-sou-tula-namdeorao-jaipurkar-and-anr-on-21-jul-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prabhakar-yeshwant-masram-and-anr-vs-sou-tula-namdeorao-jaipurkar-and-anr-on-21-jul-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 20:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 340 - Dismissed/Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prabhakar Yeshwant Masram and Anr Vs Sou Tula Namdeorao Jaipurkar and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Supreme Court held that, &#8216;Typographical Errors In Pleadings Cannot Trigger Proceedings U/S 340 CrPC Unless They Amount To Deliberate Falsehood&#8217; and &#8216;Wrong Statement&#8217; In Pleadings Not Necessarily A &#8216;False Statement&#8217;. Note: This is a Criminal <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Appeal&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A request to a higher court to review a decision.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/appeal/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Appeal</a> filed in 2015, got disposed in 2026. A full 12 years&#8230; Hope the parties are [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/prabhakar-yeshwant-masram-and-anr-vs-sou-tula-namdeorao-jaipurkar-and-anr-on-21-jul-2026/">Prabhakar Yeshwant Masram and Anr Vs Sou Tula Namdeorao Jaipurkar and Anr on 21 Jul 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prabhakar-yeshwant-masram-and-anr-vs-sou-tula-namdeorao-jaipurkar-and-anr-on-21-jul-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shikha Lall Vs Prince Agarwal on 7 Nov 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shikha-lall-vs-prince-agarwal-on-7-nov-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shikha-lall-vs-prince-agarwal-on-7-nov-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 27 - Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shikha Lall Vs Prince Agarwal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Delhi High court relying on two judgments, Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010 and Afia Rasheed Khan Vs Mazharuddin Ali Khan and Anr on 10 Oct 2022, held that New Delhi does not have <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Jurisdiction&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The authority of a court to hear a case.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/jurisdiction/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>jurisdiction</a> under PWDV Act. From Para 16, 16. A perusal of the above [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/shikha-lall-vs-prince-agarwal-on-7-nov-2024/">Shikha Lall Vs Prince Agarwal on 7 Nov 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shikha-lall-vs-prince-agarwal-on-7-nov-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pranjal Poddar and Ors Vs Shivani Gupta on 21 Apr 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pranjal-poddar-and-ors-vs-shivani-gupta-on-21-apr-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pranjal-poddar-and-ors-vs-shivani-gupta-on-21-apr-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pranjal Poddar and Ors Vs Shivani Gupta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 27 - Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge bench of Allahabad High Court at Lucknow, held as follows, From Para 21, 21. The present domestic violence case has been filed by the answering <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a> after the case filed by applicant no.3. The applicant no.1 also filed a case under Section 12(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Principal Judge, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/pranjal-poddar-and-ors-vs-shivani-gupta-on-21-apr-2026/">Pranjal Poddar and Ors Vs Shivani Gupta on 21 Apr 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pranjal-poddar-and-ors-vs-shivani-gupta-on-21-apr-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 27 - Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji has passed this <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Order</a> around the definition of a Temporary residence as held by the Section 27 of the PWDV Act 2005. 9. All legislative enactments on matrimonial disputes or custody matters make ordinary residence or residence or the place where parties lived together or the place of cause of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/">Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vikram Kumar Jha Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr on 10 Jul 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikram-kumar-jha-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-10-jul-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikram-kumar-jha-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-10-jul-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 164 - Recording of Confessions and Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Incest Or Rape Or Sexual Or Sexual Harassment Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse or Violation of CrPC 41A per Guidelines in Arnesh Kumar Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikram Kumar Jha Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single bench Judge of Delhi High Court rightly remarked about how the abuse of Women-oriented laws is prevalent in our Country. From Paras 3 and 4, 3. It is contended by learned Senior Counsel for petitioners that the impugned FIR is a complete abuse of process insofar as serious allegations of sexual misconduct have [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikram-kumar-jha-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-10-jul-2026/">Vikram Kumar Jha Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr on 10 Jul 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikram-kumar-jha-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-10-jul-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs N.C.T. Delhi and Anr on 23 Mar 2001</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 438 - Anticipatory Bail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs N.C.T. Delhi and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Supreme Court held as follows, The jurisdiction to grant <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Bail&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/bail/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>bail</a> has to be exercised on the basis of well settled principles having regard to the circumstances of each case and not in an arbitrary manner. While granting the bail, the court has to keep in mind the nature of accusations, the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/">Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs N.C.T. Delhi and Anr on 23 Mar 2001</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pooja Ramesh Singh Vs JnK Bank and Anr on 02 Jul 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-ramesh-singh-vs-jnk-bank-and-anr-on-02-jul-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-ramesh-singh-vs-jnk-bank-and-anr-on-02-jul-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 04:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pooja Ramesh Singh Vs JnK Bank and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court was surprised to know that fake judgments mentioned in NCLT Judgment were not caught by NCLAT. From Paras 15 and 16, 15. It is not in dispute that the judgments relied upon by the NCLT are non-existent, and some AI-generated paragraphs are wrongly attributed to genuine citations. An independent [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-ramesh-singh-vs-jnk-bank-and-anr-on-02-jul-2026/">Pooja Ramesh Singh Vs JnK Bank and Anr on 02 Jul 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-ramesh-singh-vs-jnk-bank-and-anr-on-02-jul-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.S.S.K.Durga Prasad Vs NCDRC and Ors on 24 Jun 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/a-s-s-k-durga-prasad-vs-ncdrc-and-ors-on-24-jun-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/a-s-s-k-durga-prasad-vs-ncdrc-and-ors-on-24-jun-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 07:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.S.S.K.Durga Prasad Vs NCDRC and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate services are not within the abmit of Consumer Protection Act 2019]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability Under Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of AP High Court held that Advocate services do not come under the ambit of Consumer Protection Act and as such litigation against such services is not maintainable. From Para 4, 4. Learned Counsel for the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> could not satisfy about the maintainability of the complaint against an advocate for alleged deficiency [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/a-s-s-k-durga-prasad-vs-ncdrc-and-ors-on-24-jun-2026/">A.S.S.K.Durga Prasad Vs NCDRC and Ors on 24 Jun 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/a-s-s-k-durga-prasad-vs-ncdrc-and-ors-on-24-jun-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ayush Bajpai Vs State of U.P. and Ors 25 Jun 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ayush-bajpai-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-25-jun-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ayush-bajpai-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-25-jun-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 06:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayush Bajpai Vs State of U.P. and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Advice of Advocate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Allahabad High Court held as follows, The other aspect, in this case, is that the petitioner is an Advocate. He can be paid his fee by the Government, by a respectable man or a man who is not so respectable. An Advocate could be defending an accused who is indeed involved [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ayush-bajpai-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-25-jun-2026/">Ayush Bajpai Vs State of U.P. and Ors 25 Jun 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ayush-bajpai-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-25-jun-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-07-28 23:15:23 by W3 Total Cache
-->