<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShadesOfKnife, Author at Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/author/sokadm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/author/sokadm/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti on 17 Mar 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 142 - Enforcement of decrees and orders of Supreme Court and orders as to discovery etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce granted on Cruelty ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce Granted to Husband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine of Frustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Patna High Court, used &#8220;Doctrine of frustration&#8221;&#160;in addition to Cruelty to dissolve a marriage registered under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. From Paras 39, 39. But, at same time, we are also mindful of the legal position that we cannot exercise power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/">Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti on 17 Mar 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Offices of Dowry Prohibition Officers in AP designated as Police Stations?</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/are-dowry-prohibition-officers-in-ap-designated-as-police-stations/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/are-dowry-prohibition-officers-in-ap-designated-as-police-stations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 14:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Are Dowry Prohibition Officers in AP designated as Police Stations?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry Prohibition Act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 8B - Dowry Prohibition Officers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Continuing from Round-1 litigation here, this page captures the Round-2 litigation efforts. Now that the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Respondent</a> #3 in WP(PIL).No. 115/2025 admitted to AP High Court that Dowry Advisory Boards were activated hurriedly from August 2025, the next step was to check if the Dowry Prohibition Officers are actually performing the DPO Activities (specifically the 6 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/are-dowry-prohibition-officers-in-ap-designated-as-police-stations/">Are Offices of Dowry Prohibition Officers in AP designated as Police Stations?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/are-dowry-prohibition-officers-in-ap-designated-as-police-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BSA Sec 63 - Admissibility of electronic records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 65B - Admissibility of electronic records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A full bench of Supreme Court of India decided this issue, inconclusively. Problem Statement, simply put is, From Para 1, 1. <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Petitioner</a>, Pune Bar Association, contends that Section 63(4) of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 20231, read with the Schedule thereto is unconstitutional as it imposes undue hardship on an ordinary litigant by requiring submission of a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/">Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chidurala Shyamsubder Vs State of Telangana on 27 Aug 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chidurala-shyamsubder-vs-state-of-telangana-on-27-aug-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chidurala-shyamsubder-vs-state-of-telangana-on-27-aug-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 04:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chidurala Shyamsubder Vs State of Telangana]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I came across the following snippet of post on 23-May-2026. Pulled out the above <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Order</a> by the High Court of Telangana, with little difficulty. . I went to the decision relied on by this case/judge in Para-3 and obtained this wonderful common Order with respect of FSS Act 2006 by the erstwhile Combined High Court [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/chidurala-shyamsubder-vs-state-of-telangana-on-27-aug-2018/">Chidurala Shyamsubder Vs State of Telangana on 27 Aug 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chidurala-shyamsubder-vs-state-of-telangana-on-27-aug-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Birendra Kumar Tiwari Vs Neetu Tiwari on 07 Dec 2022</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/birendra-kumar-tiwari-vs-neetu-tiwari-on-07-dec-2022/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/birendra-kumar-tiwari-vs-neetu-tiwari-on-07-dec-2022/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 15:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Chhattisgarh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birendra Kumar Tiwari Vs Neetu Tiwari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Denied to Daughter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge bench at High Court of Chhattisgarh held as follows while denying maintenance to a major daughter, who refused to live with father. From Para 5, 5. It is explicit from impugned order that respondent has attained the majority and also pursuing B.A. final year. As per Section 125 Cr.P.C. to get maintenance [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/birendra-kumar-tiwari-vs-neetu-tiwari-on-07-dec-2022/">Birendra Kumar Tiwari Vs Neetu Tiwari on 07 Dec 2022</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/birendra-kumar-tiwari-vs-neetu-tiwari-on-07-dec-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate on 19 May 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/parvinder-singh-khurana-vs-enforcement-of-directorate-on-19-may-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/parvinder-singh-khurana-vs-enforcement-of-directorate-on-19-may-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS 210 - Cognizance of Offences by Magistrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS 223 - Examination of Complainant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS Sec 2(1)(k) - Definition of Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of the Apex Court held that an accused must be given an opportunity of hearing under the first proviso to Section 223(1) of the BNSS, even where the prosecution complaint was filed before July 1, 2024. The Court clarified that non-compliance with this requirement makes the cognizance order void ab initio. From [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/parvinder-singh-khurana-vs-enforcement-of-directorate-on-19-may-2026/">Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate on 19 May 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/parvinder-singh-khurana-vs-enforcement-of-directorate-on-19-may-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ankit Saha Vs State of UP and Anr on 03 Dec 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ankit-saha-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-03-dec-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ankit-saha-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-03-dec-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ankit Saha Vs State of UP and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Order Set Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knife Be Unable To Maintain Herself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Approached Court with Unclean Hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Not Initiated Suo Moto]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Allahabad bench of Allahabad High Court held as follows on two aspects, From Paras 9 to 11, (Failed to prove that Wife was &#8216;unable to maintain herself&#8216;) 9. From the perusal of Section 125 Cr.P.C., it is clear that maintenance can be awarded to the wife, when she is unable to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ankit-saha-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-03-dec-2025/">Ankit Saha Vs State of UP and Anr on 03 Dec 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ankit-saha-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-03-dec-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kamaljeet Kaur and Anr Vs Harbhajan Singh and Anr on 26 Aug 2022</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kamaljeet-kaun-and-anr-vs-harbhajan-singh-and-anr-on-26-aug-2022/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kamaljeet-kaun-and-anr-vs-harbhajan-singh-and-anr-on-26-aug-2022/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cases where Perjury Proceedings were initated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false affidavit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 125 CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court held that initiation of proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. was justified where the court found possible false statements regarding employment in a maintenance petition. The Court observed that such proceedings aim to protect the sanctity of judicial processes. The Court ruled that the truth of the allegations must emerge during the enquiry. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kamaljeet-kaun-and-anr-vs-harbhajan-singh-and-anr-on-26-aug-2022/">Kamaljeet Kaur and Anr Vs Harbhajan Singh and Anr on 26 Aug 2022</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kamaljeet-kaun-and-anr-vs-harbhajan-singh-and-anr-on-26-aug-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr.Praveen R Vs Dr.Arpitha on 31 Aug 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-praveen-r-vs-dr-arpitha-on-31-aug-2021/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-praveen-r-vs-dr-arpitha-on-31-aug-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cases where Perjury Proceedings were initated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false affidavit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindu Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMA Sec 24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income suppression]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Karnataka High Court held that when a court records a specific finding that a party suppressed material facts on oath, it cannot dismiss a perjury application as premature merely because the main case remains pending. The Court ruled that allegations of false evidence affect the purity of judicial proceedings and require prompt consideration. It [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-praveen-r-vs-dr-arpitha-on-31-aug-2021/">Dr.Praveen R Vs Dr.Arpitha on 31 Aug 2021</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-praveen-r-vs-dr-arpitha-on-31-aug-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BNSS 379 &#8211; Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bnss-379-procedure-in-cases-mentioned-in-section-215/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bnss-379-procedure-in-cases-mentioned-in-section-215/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 06:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS 379 - Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury Under 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>379. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215.&#8212; (1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 215, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/bnss-379-procedure-in-cases-mentioned-in-section-215/">BNSS 379 &#8211; Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bnss-379-procedure-in-cases-mentioned-in-section-215/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-06-18 01:05:18 by W3 Total Cache
-->