web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Month: June 2019

Absent Petition (Template) under section 317 of Cr.P.C.

Posted on June 27, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Here is a Sample/template for absent petition under section 317 of Cr.P.C.

Format of 317 CrPC petition - Sample
Posted in File a Petition | Tagged CrPC 317 - Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases

IPC 228 – Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding

Posted on June 23, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

228. Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding.

—Whoever intentionally offers any insult, or causes any interruption to any public servant, while such public servant is sitting in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thou­sand rupees, or with both.

State Amendment Andhra Pradesh.

—In Andhra Pradesh offence under section 228 is cognizable. [Vide A.P.G.O. Ms. No. 732, dated 5th December, 1991].

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 228 - Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding

IPC 210 – Fraudulently obtaining decree for sum not due

Posted on June 23, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

210. Fraudulently obtaining decree for sum not due.

—Whoever fraudulently obtains a decree or order against any person for a sum not due or for a larger sum than is due, or for any property or interest in property to which he is not entitled, or fraudu­lently causes a decree or order to be executed against any person after it has been satisfied or for anything in respect of which it has been satisfied, or fraudulently suffers or permits any such act to be done in his name, shall be punished with imprison­ment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 210 - Fraudulently obtaining decree for sum not due

IPC 208 – Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due

Posted on June 23, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

208. Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due.

—Whoever fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be passed against him at the suit of any person for a sum not due or for a larger sum than is due to such person or for any property or interest in property to which such person is not entitled, or fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be executed against him after it has been satisfied, or for anything in respect of which it has been satisfied, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Illustration

A institutes a suit against Z. Z knowing that A is likely to obtain a decree against him, fraudulently suffers a judgment to pass against him for a larger amount at the suit of B, who has no just claim against him, in order that B, either on his own ac­count or for the benefit of Z, may share in the proceeds of any sale of Z’s property which may be made under A’s decree. Z has committed an offence under this section.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 208 - Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due

IPC 207 – Fraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution

Posted on June 23, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

207. Fraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution.

—Whoever fraudulently accepts, re­ceives or claims any property or any interest therein, knowing that he has no right or rightful claim to such property or interest, or practices any deception touching any right to any property or any interest therein, intending thereby to prevent that property or interest therein from being taken as a forfei­ture or in satisfaction of a fine, under a sentence which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced by a Court of Justice or other competent authority, or from being taken in execution of a decree or order which has been made, or which he knows to be likely to be made by a Court of Justice in a civil suit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either de­scription for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 207 - Fraudulent claim to property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution

IPC 206 – Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution

Posted on June 23, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

206. Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution.

—Whoever fraudulently removes, conceals, transfers or delivers to any person any property or any interest therein, intending thereby to prevent that property or interest therein from being taken as a forfei­ture or in satisfaction of a fine, under a sentence which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced, by a Court of Justice or other competent authority, or from being taken in execution of a decree or order which has been made, or which he knows to be likely to be made by a Court of Justice in a civil suit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either de­scription for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 206 - Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution

IPC 205 – False personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution

Posted on June 23, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

205. False personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution.

—Whoever falsely personates another, and in such assumed character makes any admission or statement, or confesses judgment, or causes any process to be issued or becomes bail or security, or does any other act in any suit or criminal prosecu­tion, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 205 - False personation for purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution

Shabnam Parveen Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors on 24 November, 2017

Posted on June 5, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

High Court of Calcutta (appellette side) has held that u/s 36 of PWDV Act, PWDV Act provisions are in addition to existing laws and basing that argument held that since the complainant (Shabnam Parveen) and the respondent are mohammaden, the respondent, being father-in-law, is under no obligation to provide maintain allowance to the widow of his son namely the petitioner

Shabnam Parveen Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors on 24 November, 2017

Indiankanoon.org link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/33442063/

Reference: https://www.livelaw.in/muslim-father-in-law-no-obligation-maintain-sons-widow-dv-act-calcutta-hc-read-judgment/


Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Muslim DV Case Pay No Maintenance to Daughter-in-Law PIL - CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 Must Go From Statute Book PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied Shabnam Parveen Vs The State of West Bengal and Ors

Post navigation

  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
delhipolice Delhi Police @delhipolice ·
26 Jul

โš ๏ธ FACT CHECK: FAKE VIDEO โš ๏ธThe viral video claiming Delhi Police DCP Sumit Jha resigned over student protests is completely fake and AI generated. The authentic footage, in which the officer addresses the public regarding active misinformation campaigns, is available vide link

Reply on Twitter 2081352316767396053 Retweet on Twitter 2081352316767396053 597 Like on Twitter 2081352316767396053 2294 X 2081352316767396053
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
itdp_official iTDP Official @itdp_official ·
31 Jul

Zero Airports..

Zero Vision..

Zero @ysjagan..

The numbers speak louder than the slogans.

#YSRCPNeverAgain #UttarandhraKalalakuRekkalu
#BhogapuramAirport

Reply on Twitter 2083105701380198733 Retweet on Twitter 2083105701380198733 102 Like on Twitter 2083105701380198733 379 X 2083105701380198733
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
renuka_jetti RENUKA.JETTI.LL.B. @renuka_jetti ·
1 Aug

เฐเฐ‚ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐพเฐฐเฑ เฐธเฐพเฐฐเฑ #YCP paytm เฐ•เฐฟ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฑ เฐคเฑ‹ เฐ•เฑŠเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฐฟเฐจเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฑ ๐Ÿ‘
#YcpCriminalPolitics
#EndOfYCP
#HOPEJETTI

Reply on Twitter 2083419566785646723 Retweet on Twitter 2083419566785646723 39 Like on Twitter 2083419566785646723 110 X 2083419566785646723
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
yashtdp_ Yash @yashtdp_ ·
1 Aug

เฐฎเฐพเฐœเฑ€ เฐฎเฑเฐ–เฑเฐฏเฐฎเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐฐเฐฟ เฐถเฑเฐฐเฑ€ เฐœเฐ—เฐจเฑ เฐฐเฑ†เฐกเฑเฐกเฐฟ เฐ—เฐพเฐฐเฑ‚,

เฐคเฐพเฐœเฐพเฐ—เฐพ เฐตเฐšเฑเฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฑเฐค "เฐ…เฐชเฑเฐชเฐฒเฐฐเฐพเฐœเฑ เฐฌเฑ†เฐฏเฐฟเฐฒเฑ เฐชเฐฟเฐŸเฑ€เฐทเฐจเฑ เฐ•เฑŠเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฐฟเฐตเฑ‡เฐค!" เฐšเฑ‚เฐถเฐพเฐ• เฐ†เฐฏเฐจ เฐตเฐฏเฐธเฑ เฐคเฑ†เฐฒเฑเฐธเฑเฐ•เฑ‹เฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐพ เฐฎเฑ€เฐ•เฑ เฐธเฑเฐ•เฑเฐฐเฐฟเฐชเฑเฐŸเฑ เฐตเฑเฐฐเฐพเฐธเฐฟ เฐ‡เฐšเฑเฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐตเฐพเฐกเฐฟเฐจเฐฟ เฐคเฐฟเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฑเฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐŸเฑ‚.. เฐฆเฐฏเฐšเฑ‡เฐธเฐฟ เฐฎเฑ€ เฐฎเฑ†เฐŸเฑเฐŸเฑเฐคเฑ‹ เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ เฐ•เฑŠเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฑเฐ•เฑ‹เฐ•เฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ!

"45 เฐเฐณเฑเฐฒเฑ.. เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐšเฑเฐฎเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฑ เฐตเฐฏเฐธเฐฏเฐฟเฐชเฑ‹เฐฏเฐฟเฐ‚เฐฆเฐฟเฐฒเฑ‡, เฐ†เฐฏเฐจ เฐŽเฐตเฐฐเฑ‹ เฐฆเฐพเฐฐเฐฟเฐจเฐชเฑ‹เฐฏเฑ‡

Reply on Twitter 2083378805889278044 Retweet on Twitter 2083378805889278044 17 Like on Twitter 2083378805889278044 59 X 2083378805889278044
Load More

Recent Posts

  • Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P. on 29 May 2026 July 26, 2026
  • Prabhakar Yeshwant Masram and Anr Vs Sou Tula Namdeorao Jaipurkar and Anr on 21 Jul 2026 July 26, 2026
  • Shikha Lall Vs Prince Agarwal on 7 Nov 2024 July 21, 2026
  • Pranjal Poddar and Ors Vs Shivani Gupta on 21 Apr 2026 July 21, 2026
  • Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010 July 21, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice โ€“ Format with Legal Explanation (5,141 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (3,159 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (2,538 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (2,141 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case โ€“ Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (2,076 views)
  • Can You Travel Abroad After an FIR Is Registered? โ€“ Legal Position Explained (2,043 views)
  • Life Cycle of a Perjury Case (2,020 views)
  • Application for Certified Copy of FIR โ€“ Format, Procedure and Sample Draft (1,762 views)
  • Appeal, Revision and Review Explained (1,732 views)
  • Life Cycle Stages of a Restitution of Conjugal Rights Case (1,695 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (439)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (424)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (387)Landmark Case (384)1-Judge Bench Decision (370)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (298)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (91)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC (70)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (62)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (44)CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents (43)HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court (42)Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground (42)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (760)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (329)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (187)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (167)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (95)Legal Procedure (83)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (71)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (63)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (53)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (51)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (47)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (47)Prakasam DV Cases (46)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (28)

Recent Comments

  • vinod gupta on Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice โ€“ Format with Legal Explanation
  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases โ€“ Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • ShadesOfKnife on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)

Archives of SoK

  • July 2026 (19)
  • June 2026 (19)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • EWR (Newark) on 2026-09-02 September 2, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Sep 2, 05:00 - 09:00 UTC Jul 21, 15:30 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in EWR (Newark) datacenter on 2026-09-02 between 05:00 and 09:00 UTC.Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window […]
    Cloudflare

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 103.89.15.35 | SD August 2, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 207 | First: 2019-03-02 | Last: 2026-08-02
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati and Advocate Suprajaa Rajan
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 488 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel