web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Month: December 2018

Kapil Kumar Beri Vs The State Of Delhi (N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 19 December, 2018

Posted on December 22, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this judgment from Hon’ble Delhi High Court, it was held that the prosecution could not prove the offence of incest laid on the father.

Per Para 26,

While it is true that the evidence of the prosecutrix deserves to be given weight and in certain circumstances can be acted upon without any corroboration, in cases of incest, there is always a need for greater and more acute scrutiny, inasmuch as such allegations against persons related by blood (own biological father, for example) smack of bestial instinct and total absence of basic human values and discretion. It is sad to note that the trial Judge blindly accepted the prosecution story without going into the aspects which render it highly improbable, virtually impossible. The erroneous approach of the trial court has led to serious miscarriage of justice in the present case unreasonably holding the biological father of raping his own daughter in the teeth of loaded circumstances showing her to be of wayward ways and possibly in liaison with a male acquaintance.

Kapil Kumar Beri Vs The State Of Delhi (N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 19 December, 2018

 

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged False Incest Or Rape Or Sexual Or Sexual Harassment Allegations IPC 376 - Punishment for rape Kapil Kumar Beri Vs The State of Delhi (N.C.T. Of Delhi) | Leave a comment

Satish Deka and Ors Vs Jagya Ram Mazumdar on 31 July, 2017

Posted on December 22, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Hon’ble High Court of Gauhati has held that “209 IPC should be complaint from magistrate and not private complaint“.

Satish Deka And Ors Vs Jagya Ram Mazumdar on 31 July, 2017

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Gauhati Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged IPC 209 - Complaint by Magistrate and Not Private Complaint IPC 209 - Dishonestly making false claim in Court Satish Deka And Ors Vs Jagya Ram Mazumdar | Leave a comment

The State of Maharashtra Vs Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap

Posted on December 21, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is the case of rape and murder of TCS employee, Esther Anuhya, in Mumbai, who hailed from Machilipatnam, A.P.

The State of Maharastra Vs Chandrabhan Sudam Snap on 20 December, 2018

A brief timeline of case:

January 29, 2014 13:14 IST
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/mumbai-techie-esther-anuhya-mumbai-police-tcs-178819-2014-01-29

Mar 4, 2014, 12:32 IST
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Thief-posing-as-cabby-raped-and-killed-techie-Esther-Anuhya/articleshow/31346513.cms

March 05, 2014 15:42
http://www.andhrawishesh.com/375-wishesh-special/44728-a-porter-solves-anuhyas-mysterious-murder-case.html

May 11, 2014 22:23 IST
https://www.ndtv.com/mumbai-news/esther-anuhya-case-accuseds-mother-friend-are-main-witnesses-561330

October 28, 2015 2:05:41 am
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/esther-anuhya-case-was-told-not-to-rely-on-system-but-i-had-faith-in-it-says-father/

Jan 5, 2016, 07:20 AM IST
https://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-why-cracking-esther-murder-case-was-difficult-2162312

October 28, 2015 1:28:57 am
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/esther-anuhya-case-mumbai-court-convicts-chandrabhan-sanap-sentencing-wednesday/

Oct 31, 2018, 07:14 IST
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/horoscope-led-police-to-esthers-killer-hc-told/articleshow/66435777.cms

Dec 20, 2018, 17:49 IST
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/bombay-hc-confirms-death-penalty-in-mumbai-techie-esther-anuhya-rape-and-murder-case/articleshow/67178458.cms


Apex Court acquitted the Convict, stating Prosecution case has holes in it.

Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap Vs State of Maharashtra on 28 Jan 2025

Other Sources:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/61280287/

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Sensational Or Peculiar Cases The State of Maharastra Vs Chandrabhan Sudam Snap | Leave a comment

Dharambir Khattar Vs UOI on 21 November, 2012

Posted on December 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Based on the Hon’ble Apex Court’s landmark judgment here, Hon’ble Delhi High Court also ruled that “Therefore, without going into the issue of whether there was non-compliance of the provisions of Section 5(2) or of Rule 419-A, it is clear that even if there was, in fact, no compliance, the evidence gathered thereupon would still be admissible. This is the clear position settled by the Supreme Court and, therefore, no further question of law arises on this aspect of the matter.“.

Dharambir Khattar Vs UOI on 21 November, 2012

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Dharambir Khattar Vs UOI Illegally Obtained Evidence Admissible As Long As Relevant to Case | Leave a comment

Mathai Vs State of Kerala on 25 May, 2015

Posted on December 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has held that “there is no legal evidence on record to show that it was his house, which was searched. The trial Court failed to appreciate that legal position, while convicting the appellants, which needs interference.”

Mathai Vs State of Kerala on 25 May, 2015

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Illegally Obtained Evidence Admissible As Long As Relevant to Case Mathai Vs State of Kerala | Leave a comment

Pooran Mal Etc Vs Director Of Inspection on 14 December, 1973

Posted on December 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Another judgment from Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly lays out that “Courts in India and in England have consistently refused to exclude relevant evidence merely on the ground that it is obtained by illegal search or seizure. Where the test of admissibility of evidence lies in relevancy, unless there is an express or implied prohibition in the Constitution or other law, evidence obtained as a result of illegal search or seizure is not liable to be shut out.”

Pooran Mal Etc Vs Director Of Inspection on 14 December, 1973

Citations : [1974 ITR SC 93 505], [1974 AIR SC 348], [1974 SCC 1 345], [1974 SCR 2 704], [1974 SCC TAX 114], [1974 ITJ 1 406], [1974 CTR 25], [1974 ITR 93 505]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/558753/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609ab91e4b014971140cc8a

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 5-Judge Constitutional Bench Decision Illegally Obtained Evidence Admissible As Long As Relevant to Case Pooran Mal Etc Vs Director Of Inspection Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

R.M.Malkani Vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 September, 1972

Posted on December 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

A landmark case wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court held that, “There is warrant for proposition that even if, evidence is illegally obtained it is admissible. Over a century ago it was said in an English case where a constable searched the appellant illegally and found a quantity of offending article in his pocket that it would be a dangerous obstacle to the administration of justice if it were held, because evidence was obtained by illegal means, it could not be used against a party charged with an offence. See Jones v. Owen“.

Facts of Case:

R.M.Malkani was at the crucial time the Coroner of Bombay. The evidence is that the patient died on 13 May, 1964. Dr. Motwani saw the appellant on 3 October, 1964. The appellant demanded Rs. 20,000. The appellant asked for payment of Rs. 20,000 in order that Dr. Adatia would avoid inconvenience and publicity in newspapers in case inquest was held. Dr. Motwani informed Dr. Adatia about the conversation with the appellant. On 4 October, 1964 the appellant rang up Dr. Motwani and said that he was willing to reduce the amount to Rs. 10,000. On 5 October, 1964 Dr. Adatia received calls from the appellant asking him to attend the Coroner’s Court on 6 October, 1964. Dr. Adatia got in touch with Dr. Motwani on 6 October and gave him that message. Dr. Adatia rang up the appellant on 6 October and asked for adjournment. The appellant granted the adjournment to 7 October. On 6 October there were two calls from the appellant asking Dr. Adatia to attend the Coroner’s Court on 7 October and also that Dr. Adatia should contact the appellant on 6 October. Dr. Motwani rang up the appellant and told him that the telephonic conversation had upset Dr. Adatia. On 6 October Dr. Motwani conveyed to Mugwe, Director of Intelligence Bureau about the demand of bribe to the appellant.

Punch Line:

There is no violation of section 25 of the Telegraph Act in the facts and circumstances of the present case. There is warrant for proposition that even if, evidence is illegally obtained it is admissible. Over a century ago it was said in an English case where a constable searched the appellant illegally and found a quantity of offending article in his pocket that it would be a dangerous obstacle to the administration of justice if it were held, because evidence was obtained by illegal means, it could not be used against a party charged with an offence. See Jones v. Owen.

The Court will take care in two directions in admitting such evidence. First, the Court will find out that it is genuine and free from tampering or mutilation. Secondly, the Court may also secures scrupulous conduct and behaviour on behalf of the Police. The reason is that the Police Officer is more likely to behave properly if improperly obtained evidence is liable to be viewed with care and caution by the Judge. In every case the position of the accused, the nature of the investigation and the gravity of the offence must be judged in the light of the material facts and the Surrounding circumstances.

When a Court permits a tape recording to be played over it is acting on real evidence if it treats the intonation of the words to be relevant and genuine. The fact that tape recorded conversation can be altered is also borne in mind by the Court while admitting it in evidence.

R.M.Malkani Vs State of Maharashtra on 22 Sep 1972

Citations : [1973 AIR SC 157], [1973 MHLJ 92], [1973 MPLJ SC 224], [1973 SCC 1 471], [1973 SCC CRI 399], [1973 SCR 2 417], [1973 KHC 0 469], [1973 CAR 31], [1973 CRLJ SC 228]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1179783/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609ab7fe4b014971140ca8e

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Illegally Obtained Evidence Admissible As Long As Relevant to Case Indian Telegraph Act Sec 25 Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes R.M.Malkani Vs State Of Maharashtra Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

Poonam Chand Jain & Anr Vs Fazru on 28 January, 2010

Posted on December 19, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Basing on this Apex Court judgment here, Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that, “His Lordship held that an order of dismissal under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code (for short ‘the Code’) is, however, no bar to the entertainment of a second complaint on the same facts but it can be entertained only in exceptional circumstances. This Court explained the exceptional circumstances as (a) where the previous order was passed on incomplete record (b) or on a misunderstanding of the nature of the complaint (c) or the order which was passed was manifestly absurd, unjust or foolish or (d) where new facts which could not, with reasonable diligence, have been brought on the record in the previous proceedings. This Court made it very clear that interest of justice cannot permit that after a decision has been given on a complaint upon full consideration of the case, the complainant should be given another opportunity to have the complaint enquired into again.”

Poonam Chand Jain & Anr Vs Fazru on 28 January, 2010

 

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Perjury - Approached Court with Unclean Hands Poonam Chand Jain and Anr Vs Fazru Reportable Judgement or Order Second Complaint is Permissible When Different Evidence Exists | Leave a comment

All Amendments to Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) of India

Posted on December 18, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is the general procedural law of India and below are the amendments made to this law over the period.

 

S. No. Short title of amending legislation Act No. Act Year Modification or Addition Brought In Leader and Party in Central/State Government
1 The Repealing and Amending Act, 1974 56 1974 Nothing useful in particular. Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
2 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1978 45 1978 Amendment to 468 CrPC: Period of limitation for related offences which may be tried together Morarji Desai (Janata Party)
3 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1980 63 1980 All proceedings under sections 108, 109 and 110 of CrPC, pending before any Judicial Magistrate of the first class immediately before the commencement of this Act shall, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, be dealt with as if this Act had not been enacted Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
4 The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983, wiki 43 1983 In the backdrop of Mathura Custodial rape case, sections to prevent/tackle such abuse are brought in. Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
5 The Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983 46 1983 Introduction of Sec 498A IPC, Sec 198A CrPC and Sec 113A of Evidence Act
Amendment to Sections 174 and 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
6 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1988 32 1988 Nothing useful in particular. Rajiv Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
7 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1990 10 1990 Insertion of 166A: Letter of request to competent authority for investigation in a country or place outside India

Insertion of 166B: Letter of request from a country or place outside India to a
Court or an authority for investigation in India.

Vishwanath Pratap Singh (Indian National Congress)
8 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1991 43 1991 Nothing useful in particular. P.V. Narasimha Rao (Indian National Congress)
9 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Andhra Pradesh Second Amendment) Act, 1992 03 1992 Sections 494, 495 IPC are made Cognizable and non-bailable within the State of Andhra Pradesh/Telangana. N. Janardhana Reddy (Indian National Congress)
9 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1993 40 1993 New chapter VVIA introduced with provisions (150A-150L) relating to bringing back proceeds of crime from outside India. P.V. Narasimha Rao (Indian National Congress)
10 The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1993 42 1993 Kidnapping for Ransom P.V. Narasimha Rao (Indian National Congress)
11 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001 50 2001
  • Ceiling of Rs.500/- was removed.
  • Introduction of interim maintenance along with expenses of proceedings
  • Disposal of interim maintenance application within sixty days
Atal Bihari Vajpayee (Bharatiya Janata Party)
12 Code of Criminal Procedure (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2003 11 2003
  • Sections 494 and 498A of IPC are added to the list of Compoundable offence u/s 320 Cr.P.C.
N. Chandrababu Naidu (Telugu Desam Party)
13 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 25 2005
  • No woman shall be arrested after sunset and before sunrise
  • Sec 50A(1): Every police officer or other person making an arrest under this code shall forthwith give the information regarding such arrest and place where the arrested person is held to any of his friends, relatives or such persons as may be disclosed or nominated by the arrested person for the purpose of giving such information.
  • Examination includes DNA-profiling
  • Sec 144A: Power to prohibit carrying arms in possession or mass drill or mass training with arms.
  • Sec 164A: Medical examination of the victim of rape
  • Sec 291A: Identification report of Magistrate
  • Sec 311A: Power of Magistrate to order a person to give specimen signatures or handwriting
  • Sec 436A: Maximum period for which as undertrial prisoner can be detained
  • Sec 441A: Declaration by sureties
  • Increase of fines across many sections
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
14 The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 2 2006
  • Sec 195A: Threatening or inducing any person to give false evidence
  • Introduction of new chapter XXIA: Plea bargaining, (265A-265L CrPC)
  • Amendment to 340 CrPC
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
15 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Amending Act, 2006 25 2006 Different dates for effectiveness for different provisions of CrPC (Amendment) Act 2005 Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
16 Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008 5 2009
  • Introduction of Sec 41A-41D CrPC: Notice of appearance before police officer
  • Introduction of recording statements/confessions in audio-video electronic means via provisos u/s 161, 164 and 275 CrPC
  • Sec 195A CrPC: Procedure for witnesses in case of threatening etc
  • A witness of any other person may file a complaint in relation to an offence under section 195A of Indian Penal Code.
  • No adjournment should be granted at the request of a party, except where the circumstances are beyond the control of that party
  • Filing of WS under 313 CrPC
  • Sec 357A CrPC: Victim Compensation Scheme
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
17 Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2010 41 2010 Powers of Police without warrant Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
18 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, wiki 13 2013 In the aftermath of Nirbhaya gang rape case,
  • New sections for Sexual harassment, 354A-354D
  • Sec 357B and 357C CrPC: Rape Victim Compensation Scheme
  • New sections for Trafficking of persons, 370 and 370A
  • Bulk of sections for rape u/s 376 IPC, (376A-376E)
  • New offence u/s 166A was inserted into IPC which can be invoke against police if they violate laws.
  • Per the new Explanation given to sec 197 CrPC, no sanction is required to prosecute the police.
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
19 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018, wiki 22 2018 In the aftermath of the Kathua gang rape and murder case, key Acts are amended. Highlights are

(a) punishment for the offence of rape from the minimum imprisonment of seven years to ten years, which is extendable to imprisonment for life;
(b) punishment for the offence of rape on a woman under sixteen years of age shall be rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than twenty years but may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and shall also be liable to fine;
(c) punishment for the offence of rape on a woman under twelve years of age shall be rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than twenty years but may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and with fine or with death;
(d) punishment for the offence of gang rape on a woman under sixteen years of age shall be imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and with fine;
(e) punishment for the offence of gang rape on a woman under twelve years of age shall be imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and with fine or with death;
(f) investigation in relation to all rape cases shall be completed within a period of two months from the date on which the information recorded by the officer- in-charge of the police station;
(g) completion of inquiry or trial relating to the offence of rape, within a period of two months;
(h) dispose of an appeal against a conviction or acquittal in rape cases within a period of six months from the date of filing of the appeal;
(i) the provisions of anticipatory bail shall not be applicable in cases of rape or gang rape of woman under sixteen and twelve years of age;
(j) consequential amendments in the Indian Penal Code, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 relating to the cases of rape, gang rape of the woman below the age of sixteen years, twelve years, repeat offenders, to extend the applicability of compulsory registration of FIRs, fine imposed to be paid to victim, facilitate better recording of evidence and protect the dignity of rape survivor and treatment free of cost in hospitals.

Narendra Damodardas Modi (Bharatiya Janata Party)

Any new amendments will be updated as and when available.

 


The new BNSS is here.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged Amendment To Criminal Procedure Code CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Dispose Interim Maintenance Application In 60 Days | Leave a comment

The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001

Posted on December 18, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is the amendment to CrPC that removed the ceiling of Rs.500/- under the 125 CrPC. And this is the amendment that brought in ‘interim maintenance and expenses of proceeding’. A proviso is introduced which talk about disposal of interim maintenance application under 125 CrPC within 60 days. Of course, 127 CrPC is similarly screwed. And 128 CrPC is altered.

The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001

All the amendments made to the CrPC are available here.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents CrPC 127 - Alteration in allowance CrPC 128 - Enforcement of Order of Maintenance CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Dispose Interim Maintenance Application In 60 Days | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts
  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
andhrafact మన ఆంధ్ర @andhrafact ·
22h

వాడే🃏vs వీడు🧛‍♂️=సిగ్గుమాలిన అపరిచుతుడు

రాష్ట్ర మద్య నీళ్లున్న చోట WASHINGTONకడతా,center ఇవ్వదు అయినా కడతా.నా బుర్రలో వచ్చే ఆలోచనతో కడతా.CBN వల్ల కాదు ఎట్లా చెయ్యాలో ACCENTUREతో 10 సిట్టింగు వేసా,ఇదిగో డిటైల్డ్ plan.రాజధాని RE హంగామాతో 2BILLION$ తెస్తా🧛‍♂️

vs

రాజధాని అంటే ఏంటి?🃏

Reply on Twitter 2062217009140576691 Retweet on Twitter 2062217009140576691 37 Like on Twitter 2062217009140576691 77 X 2062217009140576691
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
narendramodi Narendra Modi @narendramodi ·
3 Jun

Delighted to meet the Chairman of the Rastriya Swatantra Party of Nepal Mr. Rabi Lamichhane. I welcome and fully share his desire to work closely together for a shared and prosperous future.

Nepal is a priority partner under our Neighbourhood First policy and we look forward to

Reply on Twitter 2062085139031810119 Retweet on Twitter 2062085139031810119 4893 Like on Twitter 2062085139031810119 36952 X 2062085139031810119
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
pradip103 Pradeep Bhandari(प्रदीप भंडारी)🇮🇳 @pradip103 ·
8h

CONGRESS ALLOWS SHARIA COMPLIANT GYM IN KERALA!

Congress’ win in Kerala has ensured one thing : IUML gets a free hand and Congress bends itself to the diktats of Muslim League.

Kerala’s so-called ‘Islam-friendly gym’ mandates No music. Gender segregation. Mandatory religious

Reply on Twitter 2062415901740470707 Retweet on Twitter 2062415901740470707 173 Like on Twitter 2062415901740470707 410 X 2062415901740470707
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
ani ANI @ani ·
2 Jun

#WATCH | Maharashtra: The passing out parade at the Combat Army Aviation Training School in Nashik, concluded on an emotional note for a couple as Captain Bharat Bhardwaj proposed marriage to his partner.

Reply on Twitter 2061739907320860704 Retweet on Twitter 2061739907320860704 858 Like on Twitter 2061739907320860704 14162 X 2061739907320860704
Load More

Recent Posts

  • Are Offices of Dowry Prohibition Officers in AP designated as Police Stations? June 3, 2026
  • Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026 June 2, 2026
  • Chidurala Shyamsubder Vs State of Telangana on 27 Aug 2018 May 28, 2026
  • Birendra Kumar Tiwari Vs Neetu Tiwari on 07 Dec 2022 May 27, 2026
  • Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate on 19 May 2026 May 26, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation (4,833 views)
  • Anu Aggarwal Vs Sushant Aggarwal on 20 Jan 2026 (3,363 views)
  • Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026 (3,191 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (2,438 views)
  • Jinesh CR Vs Aswathy PR on 19 Nov 2025 (2,125 views)
  • Geddam Jhansi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 07 Feb 2025 (2,087 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (1,997 views)
  • Neha Lal Vs Abhishek Kumar on 20 Jan 2026 (1,877 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (1,783 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case – Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (1,569 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (433)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (411)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (381)Landmark Case (381)1-Judge Bench Decision (361)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (293)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (92)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (66)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (61)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (43)HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Legal Terrorism (41)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (40)Divorce granted on Cruelty ground (40)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (752)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (327)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (186)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (164)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (93)Legal Procedure (73)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (70)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (61)LLB Study Material (58)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (52)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (50)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (46)Prakasam DV Cases (46)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (45)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (27)

Recent Comments

  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • ShadesOfKnife on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • KONURU VINAYKUMAR on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • ShadesOfKnife on Lifecycle Stages of a Section 498A IPC Case

Archives of SoK

  • June 2026 (2)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Cloudflare Storage Maintenance June 15, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 15, 12:00 - 13:00 UTC May 28, 22:16 UTC Scheduled - Cloudflare has scheduled maintenance for our backend storage systems. Services will continue to operate normally, but customers will be unable to create/delete/modify tunnels, routes, hostname routes, virtual networks, devices and tunnel configurations via the Dashboard or the public […]
  • Cloudflare Storage Maintenance June 4, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 4, 12:00 - 13:00 UTC May 21, 00:41 UTC Scheduled - Cloudflare has scheduled maintenance for our backend storage systems. Services will continue to operate normally, customers will be unable to modify configurations via the Dashboard or the public API for a period of up to 3 minutes. This […]
  • Network Congestion in Frankfurt June 4, 2026
    Jun 4, 06:59 UTC Resolved - Cloudflare observed network congestion in Frankfurt from 05:53 UTC to 06:08 UTC. The issue is now resolved.

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 193.193.237.158 | SD June 3, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 1,352 | First: 2025-11-25 | Last: 2026-06-03
  • 158.94.211.154 | S June 3, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 987 | First: 2026-01-28 | Last: 2026-06-03
  • 45.164.196.232 | S June 3, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 5 | First: 2026-06-03 | Last: 2026-06-03
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 599 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel