A withdrawn DVC here.
M.Rekha Vs K.Siva Kumar on 11 August, 2017
A compromise order from a Lok Adalat.
Balijineni Devika Vs Rayapaneni Motheesh on 8 April, 2017[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Another ex parte order in DV case.
A key observation by Magistrate
The Petitioner has also sought for compensation Rs.10,00,000/- from the 1st Respondent. But she did not specify as to on what counts she had sought such compensation. In these circumstances, the mere averment in the Petition is not sufficient to grant compensation to the Petitioner, since the tie between the Petitioner/ Aggrieved Person is sacred the marital tie and it cannot be equated with any business relation wherein the damages or compensation will be paid for breach.
N.Sumithra Vs R.K.Govinda Rajulu on 30 October, 2017[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
In this order from Chittor Magistrate court, all 6 respondents were set ex-parte. Just by the deposition/evidence of the knife, the magistrate believed that P.W.1 was subjected to domestic violence by demanding additional dowry.
Nice…
A.Bharathi Vs K.Bhaskar on 26 July, 2018[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
This time it is a practicing advocate who came begging for alms from her husband, not even caring to prove that she is destitute and unable to maintain herself.
See the timelines for disposal of a 125 CrPC case.
The application for maintenance, filed in 2003, was finally disposed of on 28th January, 2015 by Family Court. Then it moved onto Supreme Court and got disposed off on 25th September, 2018.
Reema Salkan Vs Sumer Singh Salkan on 25 September, 2018[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
In this order from CIC, the Commission directed the respondent authority (PIO, EPFO, Chennai) to provide the employment status relating to knife to the appellant.
Kirubananthan K Vs PIO, EPFO, Chennai[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Peculiar case of magistrate rejecting Discharge under 239 CrPC even after the parties have settled the dispute, just because 498A IPC is Non-Compoundable !!! This is in Calcutta. Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta stepped in and discharged the accused under 239 CrPC.
Soukalin Ghosh & Ors Vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 28 June, 2018[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta has gladly set aside the Rejection of Discharge petition under 239 CrPC and discharged accused other than husband.
Sukhamay Mondal Vs The State Of West Bengal on 6 August, 2018[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Justice Shri Shiv Narayan Dhingra has fined a lying knife for an amount of Rs.10,000/- for not divulging the fact that there is an earlier settlement arrived at by the parties in the local court and an affidavit to the same tune was given in High Court. Hiding all this information, the knife filed for maintenance under 125 CrPC again.
Gurbinder Singh vs Manjit Kaur on 25 January, 2010Bad Behavior has blocked 1482 access attempts in the last 7 days.